Literature DB >> 22608242

Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit.

Ann Schoofs Hundt1, Jean A Adams, J Andrew Schmid, Linda M Musser, James M Walker, Tosha B Wetterneck, Stephen V Douglas, Bonnie L Paris, Pascale Carayon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop, conduct, and evaluate a proactive risk assessment (PRA) of the design and implementation of CPOE in an ICU.
METHODS: We developed a PRA method based on issues identified from documented experience with conventional PRA methods and the constraints of an organization about to implement CPOE in an intensive care unit. The PRA method consists of three phases: planning (three months), team (one five-hour meeting), and evaluation (short- and long-term).
RESULTS: Sixteen unique relevant vulnerabilities were identified as a result of the PRA team's efforts. Negative consequences resulting from the vulnerabilities included potential patient safety and quality of care issues, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, increases in cognitive burden on CPOE users, and/or worker inconvenience or distress. Actions taken to address the vulnerabilities included redesign of the technology, process (workflow) redesign, user training, and/or ongoing monitoring. Verbal and written evaluation by the team members indicated that the PRA method was useful and that participants were willing to participate in future PRAs. Long-term evaluation was accomplished by monitoring an ongoing "issues list" of CPOE problems identified by or reported to IT staff. Vulnerabilities identified by the team were either resolved prior to CPOE implementation (n=7) or shortly thereafter (n=9). No other issues were identified beside those identified by the team.
CONCLUSIONS: Generally positive results from the various evaluations including a long-term evaluation demonstrate the value of developing an efficient PRA method that meets organizational and contextual requirements and constraints.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22608242      PMCID: PMC3430828          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  19 in total

1.  A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Amit Vats; Kamran Ahmed; Andrea B Smith; Nick Sevdalis; Helgi Jonannsson; Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06

2.  A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in health care: making the most of the team and its meetings.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Gerry Armitage; Maria Neary; Gillian Hollingsworth
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-08

Review 3.  Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology.

Authors:  Tosha B Wetterneck; Kathleen A Skibinski; Tanita L Roberts; Susan M Kleppin; Mark E Schroeder; Myra Enloe; Steven S Rough; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Towards a framework to select techniques for error prediction: supporting novice users in the healthcare sector.

Authors:  Melinda Lyons
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Challenges to inter-departmental coordination of patient transfers: a workflow perspective.

Authors:  Joanna Abraham; Madhu C Reddy
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  FMEA team performance in health care: A qualitative analysis of team member perceptions.

Authors:  Tosha B Wetterneck; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.

Authors:  P Carayon; A Schoofs Hundt; B-T Karsh; A P Gurses; C J Alvarado; M Smith; P Flatley Brennan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

8.  Involving intensive care unit nurses in a proactive risk assessment of the medication management process.

Authors:  Hélène Faye; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Christine Baker; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-08

9.  Defining near misses: towards a sharpened definition based on empirical data about error handling processes.

Authors:  Marieke Kessels-Habraken; Tjerk Van der Schaaf; Jan De Jonge; Christel Rutte
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety.

Authors:  Pascal Bonnabry; Christelle Despont-Gros; Damien Grauser; Pierre Casez; Magali Despond; Deborah Pugin; Claire Rivara-Mangeat; Magali Koch; Martine Vial; Anne Iten; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends.

Authors:  S Quaglini; L Sacchi; G Lanzola; N Viani
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Derek W Meeks; Amirhossein Takian; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh; Nick Barber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Anping Xie; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Richard Holden; Ayse P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  How do community pharmacies recover from e-prescription errors?

Authors:  Olufunmilola K Odukoya; Jamie A Stone; Michelle A Chui
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-12-04

9.  Toward safer health care: a review strategy of FDA medical device adverse event database to identify and categorize health information technology related events.

Authors:  Hong Kang; Ju Wang; Bin Yao; Sicheng Zhou; Yang Gong
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-10-12

10.  CancelRx: a health IT tool to reduce medication discrepancies in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  Taylor L Watterson; Jamie A Stone; Roger Brown; Ka Z Xiong; Anthony Schiefelbein; Edmond Ramly; Peter Kleinschmidt; Michael Semanik; Lauren Craddock; Samantha Pitts; Taylor Woodroof; Michelle A Chui
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.