Literature DB >> 20860244

Involving intensive care unit nurses in a proactive risk assessment of the medication management process.

Hélène Faye1, A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez, Ben-Tzion Karsh, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Christine Baker, Pascale Carayon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vulnerabilities in the medication manage ment process can lead to serious patient harm. In intensive care units (ICUs), nurses represent the last line of defense against medication errors. Proactive risk assessment (PRA) offers methods for determining how processes can break down and how people involved in such processes can contribute to or recover from a breakdown. Such methods can also be used to identify ICU nurses' contribution to the quality and safety of medication management.
METHODS: Observation and interview data of ICU nurses work were used to develop a rich description of the nursing medication management process. A PRA method was conducted in a cardiovascular ICU to identify and evaluate failure modes in the nursing medication management process. The contributing factors to the failure modes and the recovery processes used by nurses were also characterized.
RESULTS: A total of 54 failure modes were identified across the seven steps of the medication management process. For the 5 most critical failure modes, nurses listed 21 contributing factors and 21 recovery processes. Ways were identified to redesign the medication management process, one of which consists of dealing with work system factors that contribute to the most critical failure modes.
CONCLUSIONS: From a data-analysis viewpoint, this PRA method permits one to address a variety of objectives. Different scoring methods can be used to focus on either frequency or criticality of failure modes; one may also focus on a specific step of the process under study. Efforts in eliminating or mitigating contributing factors would help reduce the criticality of the failure modes in terms of their likelihood and impact on patients and/or nurses. Developing systems to support the recovery processes used by nurses may be another approach to process redesign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860244      PMCID: PMC3039839          DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36056-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  15 in total

1.  Applicability of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments.

Authors:  Darren R Linkin; Caroline Sausman; Lilly Santos; Clarence Lyons; Catherine Fox; Linda Aumiller; John Esterhai; Beverly Pittman; Ebbing Lautenbach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology.

Authors:  Tosha B Wetterneck; Kathleen A Skibinski; Tanita L Roberts; Susan M Kleppin; Mark E Schroeder; Myra Enloe; Steven S Rough; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 3.  Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.

Authors:  P Carayon; A Schoofs Hundt; B-T Karsh; A P Gurses; C J Alvarado; M Smith; P Flatley Brennan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

4.  Using Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis tool to review the process of ordering and administrating potassium chloride and potassium phosphate.

Authors:  Rosmin Esmail; Cheryl Cummings; Deonne Dersch; Greg Duchscherer; Judy Glowa; Gail Liggett; Terrance Hulme
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2005

5.  Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection.

Authors:  Brian J Kopp; Brian L Erstad; Michelle E Allen; Andreas A Theodorou; Gail Priestley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Health Care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward.

Authors:  C M van Tilburg; I P Leistikow; C M A Rademaker; M B Bierings; A T H van Dijk
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

7.  Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J F Lloyd; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units.

Authors:  D J Cullen; B J Sweitzer; D W Bates; E Burdick; A Edmondson; L L Leape
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis.

Authors:  M Apkon; J Leonard; L Probst; L DeLizio; R Vitale
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-08

10.  Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events.

Authors:  D W Bates; D L Boyle; M B Vander Vliet; J Schneider; L Leape
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  17 in total

1.  Sociotechnical systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

2.  Safety strategies in an academic radiation oncology department and recommendations for action.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terezakis; Peter Pronovost; Kendra Harris; Theodore Deweese; Eric Ford
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2011-07

3.  Toward a process-level view of distributed healthcare tasks: Medication management as a case study.

Authors:  Nicole E Werner; Seema Malkana; Ayse P Gurses; Bruce Leff; Alicia I Arbaje
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 4.  Human factors and health information technology: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  V L Patel; T G Kannampallil
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ann Schoofs Hundt; Jean A Adams; J Andrew Schmid; Linda M Musser; James M Walker; Tosha B Wetterneck; Stephen V Douglas; Bonnie L Paris; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Richard Holden; Ayse P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Characteristics of Occupational Injuries in a Pharmaceutical Company in Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Rasouli; Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini; Mohammadkarim Bahadori; Ramin Ravangard
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04

10.  Clinical risk assessment in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Saeed Asefzadeh; Mohammad H Yarmohammadian; Ahmad Nikpey; Golrokh Atighechian
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.