Literature DB >> 22605672

The economic impact of a patient navigator program to increase screening colonoscopy.

Elena B Elkin1, Ephraim Shapiro, Jacqueline G Snow, Ann G Zauber, Marian S Krauskopf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation can increase colorectal cancer screening rates. The net economic impact of a colonoscopy patient navigator program was evaluated in an urban public hospital setting.
METHODS: Cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit analyses were performed of a colonoscopy patient navigation program at 3 urban public hospitals in the period from 2003 to 2007. Program effectiveness was assessed in a 2-group, pre- and post-program, nonrandomized evaluation, comparing program hospitals with comparison hospitals that served similar populations. Costs were assessed from the provider's perspective. Outcomes included colonoscopy volume, colonoscopy completion rate, program cost, incremental cost-effectiveness, and net monetary benefit.
RESULTS: Patient navigation was associated with a 61% increase in average monthly colonoscopy volume at program hospitals, from 114 procedures to 184 procedures, compared with a 12% increase at comparison hospitals. Adjusted for other factors, the navigator program increased colonoscopy volume by 44 to 67 additional procedures per month. Average program cost varied from $50 to $300 per patient referred to a navigator. Incremental cost-effectiveness varied from $200 to $700 per additional colonoscopy. At 2 hospitals, net revenue associated with increased colonoscopy volume exceeded the program cost per additional colonoscopy, yielding a net financial benefit; at the third hospital, the program yielded a net cost. Variation between hospitals in the program's economic impact was primarily attributable to differences in personnel costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluation of this colonoscopy patient navigator program in an urban public hospital setting suggests that such programs can be a cost-effective use of limited resources and yield a net financial benefit for providers.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22605672     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

Review 1.  New York Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition: A public health effort to increase colon cancer screening and address health disparities.

Authors:  Steven H Itzkowitz; Sidney J Winawer; Marian Krauskopf; Mari Carlesimo; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katy Huang; Thomas K Weber; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Reinier G S Meester; Samir Gupta; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Active Choice and Financial Incentives to Increase Rates of Screening Colonoscopy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shivan J Mehta; Jordyn Feingold; Matthew Vandertuyn; Tess Niewood; Catherine Cox; Chyke A Doubeni; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Effect of patient navigation on time to diagnostic resolution among patients with colorectal cancer-related abnormalities.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Kristen J Wells; Cathy D Meade; Ercilia Calcano; Richard Roetzheim
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Predicting Non-Adherence with Outpatient Colonoscopy Using a Novel Electronic Tool that Measures Prior Non-Adherence.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumenthal; Gaurav Singal; Shikha S Mangla; Eric A Macklin; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Opt-in Versus Opt-Out Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach.

Authors:  Shivan J Mehta; Tanya Khan; Carmen Guerra; Catherine Reitz; Timothy McAuliffe; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Authors:  Karen E Kim; Fornessa Randal; Matt Johnson; Michael Quinn; Chieko Maene; Sonja Hoover; Valerie Richmond-Reese; Florence K L Tangka; Djenaba A Joseph; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

10.  Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giridhar Mohan; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Donatus U Ekwueme; Susan A Sabatino; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Yinan Peng; Shawna L Mercer; Anilkrishna B Thota
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.