BACKGROUND: The 45-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire assesses health-related quality of life in patients with liver, bile duct, and pancreatic cancers. Although the FACT-Hep was initially derived from patient input, this study's researchers sought to verify adequate coverage of items by soliciting open-ended input from patients with advanced disease. METHODS: As part of a larger study in collaboration with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 50 people (60% male, 80% caucasian, average age 60.4 years) with stage 3 or 4 hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancer were recruited. Participants generated and ranked up to 10 important symptoms and concerns that physicians should monitor when assessing the value of chemotherapy. Patients were also able to provide open-ended, qualitative information that was evaluated systematically. Ten expert physicians also provided input on priority symptoms. RESULTS: The resulting 18-item NCCN-FACT Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Symptom Index (NFHSI-18) demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .89) and moderate to strong correlations with measures of physical well-being (ρ = .76), emotional well-being (ρ = 0.52), and functional well-being (ρ = 0.57). Scores on the NFHSI-18 were also highly correlated with the original hepatobiliary scale of the FACT-Hep (ρ = .82; all P < .001). Compared with patients with better performance status, patients with poor performance status had worse NFHSI-18 symptom scores, F(3,47) = 9.74; P = .0003. CONCLUSIONS: The NFHSI-18 assesses symptoms of importance to patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers and demonstrates promising measurement properties. The scale is a good candidate for brief symptom assessment in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: The 45-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire assesses health-related quality of life in patients with liver, bile duct, and pancreatic cancers. Although the FACT-Hep was initially derived from patient input, this study's researchers sought to verify adequate coverage of items by soliciting open-ended input from patients with advanced disease. METHODS: As part of a larger study in collaboration with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 50 people (60% male, 80% caucasian, average age 60.4 years) with stage 3 or 4 hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancer were recruited. Participants generated and ranked up to 10 important symptoms and concerns that physicians should monitor when assessing the value of chemotherapy. Patients were also able to provide open-ended, qualitative information that was evaluated systematically. Ten expert physicians also provided input on priority symptoms. RESULTS: The resulting 18-item NCCN-FACT Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Symptom Index (NFHSI-18) demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .89) and moderate to strong correlations with measures of physical well-being (ρ = .76), emotional well-being (ρ = 0.52), and functional well-being (ρ = 0.57). Scores on the NFHSI-18 were also highly correlated with the original hepatobiliary scale of the FACT-Hep (ρ = .82; all P < .001). Compared with patients with better performance status, patients with poor performance status had worse NFHSI-18 symptom scores, F(3,47) = 9.74; P = .0003. CONCLUSIONS: The NFHSI-18 assesses symptoms of importance to patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers and demonstrates promising measurement properties. The scale is a good candidate for brief symptom assessment in clinical trials.
Authors: Nancy Heffernan; David Cella; Kimberly Webster; Linda Odom; Mary Martone; Steven Passik; Marilyn Bookbinder; Yuman Fong; William Jarnagin; Leslie Blumgart Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lori D McLeod; Cheryl D Coon; Susan A Martin; Sheri E Fehnel; Ron D Hays Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: David Cella; Zeeshan Butt; Hedy Lee Kindler; Charles S Fuchs; Sarah Bray; Arie Barlev; Alan Oglesby Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: David Cella; Diane Paul; Susan Yount; Rodger Winn; Chih-Hung Chang; Donald Banik; Jane Weeks Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Karen Kaiser; Rajiv Mallick; Zeeshan Butt; Mary F Mulcahy; Al B Benson; David Cella Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Ekin Secinti; Wei Wu; Deborah A Kashy; Kurt Kroenke; Jonathan B Bricker; Paul R Helft; Anita A Turk; Patrick J Loehrer; Amikar Sehdev; Ahmad A Al-Hader; Victoria L Champion; Shelley A Johns Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.713
Authors: Zeeshan Butt; Jin-Shei Lai; Jennifer L Beaumont; Karen Kaiser; Rajiv Mallick; David Cella; Jennifer L Steel Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-04-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Daniela P Ladner; Estella M Alonso; Zeeshan Butt; Juan Carlos Caicedo; David Cella; Amna Daud; John J Friedewald; Elisa J Gordon; Gordon B Hazen; Bing T Ho; Kathleen R Hoke; Jane L Holl; Michael G Ison; Raymond Kang; Sanjay Mehrotra; Luke B Preczewski; Olivia A Ross; Pamela H Sharaf; Anton I Skaro; Edward Wang; Michael S Wolf; Donna M Woods; Michael M Abecassis Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ramez Kouzy; Joseph Abi Jaoude; Daniel Lin; Nicholas D Nguyen; Molly B El Alam; Ethan B Ludmir; Cullen M Taniguchi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Ekin Secinti; Kurt Kroenke; Paul R Helft; Anita A Turk; Patrick J Loehrer; Amikar Sehdev; Ahmad A Al-Hader; Victoria L Champion; Shelley A Johns Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Pip Griffiths; John Devin Peipert; Andrea Leith; Alex Rider; Lucy Morgan; David Cella; Kim Cocks Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 3.359