Literature DB >> 22605639

Long-term incidence of breast cancer by trial arm in one county of the Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening.

Amy Ming-Fang Yen1, Stephen W Duffy, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Li-Sheng Chen, Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu, Jean Ching-Yuan Fann, Wendy Yi-Ying Wu, Chiu-Wen Su, Robert A Smith, Lászlo Tabár.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study estimated the excess incidence (overdiagnosis) of breast cancer associated with starting mammographic screening at an earlier age, by using data from the Dalarna County component of the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening.
METHODS: In Dalarna County, Sweden, 38,589 women aged 40 to 74 years were randomized to invitation to regular mammographic screening (active study population [ASP]) and 18,582 women to usual care (passive study population [PSP]). After 3 screening rounds (6-8 years after randomization), the PSP was invited to screening. The cumulative incidence of breast cancer was calculated in the ASP and PSP from randomization to 29 years later. In addition, cumulative incidence was calculated for invasive cancers, advanced invasive cancers (≥ 2 cm in maximum diameter or node-positive), and nonadvanced cancers (<2 cm and node negative).
RESULTS: There was no excess of cancers in the ASP at 29 year follow-up (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.08). Cumulative incidence in the 2 arms approximately equalized at the conclusion of the first round of screening of the PSP. There was an excess of nonadvanced cancers and a deficit of advanced cancers in the ASP, both of which persisted to 29 years.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no additional breast cancer incidence associated with 100,000 additional screens in the ASP. Results suggest that overdiagnosis is small and largely confined to the prevalence screen.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22605639     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

Review 4.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Ayse Nilufer Ozaydın; Erkin Aribal; Beyza Ozcinar; Neslihan Cabioglu; Cennet Sahin; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 6.  Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Morris; Stephen A Feig; Madeline Drexler; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Overdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: the importance of length of observation period and lead time.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Dharmishta Parmar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Pitfalls in accurate estimation of overdiagnosis: implications for screening policy and compliance.

Authors:  Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program estimated by the Norwegian Women and Cancer cohort study.

Authors:  Eiliv Lund; Nicolle Mode; Marit Waaseth; Jean-Christophe Thalabard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.