Literature DB >> 2259992

Factors affecting fusion rate in adult spondylolisthesis.

S S Kim1, F Denis, J E Lonstein, R B Winter.   

Abstract

The authors examined factors affecting fusion rate in the surgical treatment of 89 consecutive adult patients with spondylolisthesis. Two factors significantly improved fusion rate: combined anterior and posterior fusion and rigid postoperative immobilization in the cast. In 65 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, the fusion rate was raised from 70% when posterior fusion alone was used to 88% when combined anterior and posterior fusion was used. In 20 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, frequent use of combined anterior and posterior fusion contributed to a high overall fusion rate of 95%. Among patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, postoperative cast immobilization resulted in a higher fusion rate of 90% compared with a fusion rate of 63% obtained after brace immobilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2259992     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  In situ instrumented posterolateral fusion without decompression in symptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

Authors:  Mohammed Farooq Butt; Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Imtiyaz Hakeem; Munir Farooq; Manzoor Ahmed Halwai; Mohammad Ramzan Mir; Khursheed Ahmed Kangu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Low grade lytic spondylolisthesis L4/L5 treated with PLIF.

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qu Jin-Tao; Tang Yu; Wang Mei; Tang Xu-Dong; Zhang Tian-Jian; Shi Guo-Hua; Chen Lei; Hu Yue; Wang Zi-Tian; Zhou Yue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiological and functional outcome after anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion.

Authors:  F B Christensen; B Karlsmose; E S Hansen; C E Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Short-Term Impact of Bracing in Multi-Level Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Ryan Dimentberg; Saurabh Sinha; Gregory Glauser; Ian F Caplan; James M Schuster; Scott D McClintock; Jang W Yoon; Paul J Marcotte; Zarina S Ali; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Surgical management of isthmic spondylolisthesis with radicular pain.

Authors:  Faisal F Adam
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Elisa C Bass; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.

Authors:  Chad D Cole; Todd D McCall; Meic H Schmidt; Andrew T Dailey
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-04-29

10.  Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Atanu Chatterjee; Jeffrey R McConnell; Deepak K Jha; Tapas Chakraburtty
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.