Literature DB >> 2259983

Decompensation after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis.

J P Thompson1, E E Transfeldt, D S Bradford, J W Ogilvie, O Boachie-Adjei.   

Abstract

Spinal decompensation after corrective surgery for scoliosis appears to be a significant problem after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (CDI). CDI produces torsional changes in the instrumented and uninstrumented spine that could result in spinal imbalance. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional analysis including computed tomography (CT) scans to measure vertebral rotation and segmental rotation were performed to evaluate the importance of torsional changes. Moe/King Type II deformities had a substantially greater risk of imbalance. Deformities instrumented over fewer spinal segments were less likely to decompensate. Specifically, instrumentation excluding the mobile transition segment, determined by maximum segmental rotation and segmental Cobb angle, was likely to decompensate. Derotation and deformity correction excessive in relation to preoperative side bending flexibility and segmental rotation frequently resulted in imbalance. Spinal imbalance after CDI can be reduced by avoiding overcorrection and inclusion of mobile transition segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2259983     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  The Surgical Overcorrection of Lenke Type 1 Deformities with Selective Fusion Segments: What Happens to the Coronal Balance?

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Sinan Erdogan; Yunus Emre Akman; Murat Mert; Engin Carkci; Tolga Tuzuner
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-09-30

2.  Determination of lowest instrumented vertebra by the location of apical vertebra in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Fenghua Tao; Zhicai Shi; Yang Xie; Feng Pan; Yungang Wu; Ye Zhang; Zhiwei Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is neck tilt and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon? A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2).

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Kai Ann Wong; Chee Kean Lee; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Determination of the distal fusion level in the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Sung-Soo Kim; Dong-Ju Lim; Jin-Hyok Kim; Jong-Woo Kim; Kyu-Sub Um; Soo-Hyung Ahn; Se-Il Suk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

5.  Minimum 10 years follow-up surgical results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with TSRH instrumentation.

Authors:  I Teoman Benli; Bülent Ates; Serdar Akalin; Mehmet Citak; Alper Kaya; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sagittal plane lumbar responses after anterior selective thoracic fusion for main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Na; Jürgen Harms; Kee-Yong Ha; Nam-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2007-12-31

7.  Axial plane lumbar responses after anterior selective thoracic fusion for main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Na; Jürgen Harms; Kee-Yong Ha; Nam-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

8.  Transverse plane pelvic rotation increase (TPPRI) following rotationally corrective instrumentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis double curves.

Authors:  Marc A Asher; Sue-Min Lai; Brandon B Carlson; Jeffrey L Gum; Douglas C Burton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-08-26

9.  Selective thoracic surgery in the Lenke type 1A: King III and King IV type curves.

Authors:  P Parisini; M Di Silvestre; F Lolli; G Bakaloudis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients?

Authors:  M K Kwan; C Y W Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.