Literature DB >> 22596353

Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device.

S Levy-Tzedek1, S Hanassy, S Abboud, S Maidenbaum, A Amedi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visual sensory substitution devices (SSDs) use sound or touch to convey information that is normally perceived by vision. The primary focus of prior research using SSDs was the perceptual components of learning to use SSDs and their neural correlates. However, sensorimotor integration is critical in the effort to make SSDs relevant for everyday tasks, like grabbing a cup of coffee efficiently. The purpose of this study was to test the use of a novel visual-to-auditory SSD to guide a fast reaching movement.
METHODS: Using sound, the SSD device relays location, shape and color information. Participants were asked to make fast reaching movements to targets presented by the SSD.
RESULTS: After only a short practice session, blindfolded sighted participants performed fast and accurate movements to presented targets, which did not differ significantly from movements performed with visual feedback in terms of movement time, peak speed, and path length. A small but significant difference was found between the endpoint accuracy of movements under the two feedback conditions; remarkably, in both cases the average error was smaller than 0.5 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings combine with previous brain-imaging studies to support a theory of a modality-independent representation of spatial information. Task-specificity, rather than modality-specificity, of brain functions is crucially important for the rehabilitative use of SSDs in the blind and the visually impaired. We present the first direct comparison between movement trajectories performed with an SSD and ones performed under visual guidance. The accuracy level reached in this study demonstrates the potential applicability of using the visual-to-auditory SSD for performance of daily tasks which require fast, accurate reaching movements, and indicates a potential for rehabilitative use of the device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22596353     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2012-110219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  15 in total

1.  Using an auditory sensory substitution device to augment vision: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Thomas D Wright; Aaron Margolis; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cross-sensory transfer of sensory-motor information: visuomotor learning affects performance on an audiomotor task, using sensory-substitution.

Authors:  Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Itai Novick; Roni Arbel; Sami Abboud; Shachar Maidenbaum; Eilon Vaadia; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Integration and binding in rehabilitative sensory substitution: Increasing resolution using a new Zooming-in approach.

Authors:  Galit Buchs; Shachar Maidenbaum; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Are Supramodality and Cross-Modal Plasticity the Yin and Yang of Brain Development? From Blindness to Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Luca Cecchetti; Ron Kupers; Maurice Ptito; Pietro Pietrini; Emiliano Ricciardi
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-08

5.  Increasing accessibility to the blind of virtual environments, using a virtual mobility aid based on the "EyeCane": feasibility study.

Authors:  Shachar Maidenbaum; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Daniel-Robert Chebat; Amir Amedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Color improves "visual" acuity via sound.

Authors:  Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Dar Riemer; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Aging and Sensory Substitution in a Virtual Navigation Task.

Authors:  S Levy-Tzedek; S Maidenbaum; A Amedi; J Lackner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Learning New Sensorimotor Contingencies: Effects of Long-Term Use of Sensory Augmentation on the Brain and Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Sabine U König; Frank Schumann; Johannes Keyser; Caspar Goeke; Carina Krause; Susan Wache; Aleksey Lytochkin; Manuel Ebert; Vincent Brunsch; Basil Wahn; Kai Kaspar; Saskia K Nagel; Tobias Meilinger; Heinrich Bülthoff; Thomas Wolbers; Christian Büchel; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.