Literature DB >> 22596074

The accuracy of new wheelchair users' predictions about their future wheelchair use.

Helen Hoenig1, Patricia Griffiths, Shanti Ganesh, Kevin Caves, Frances Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the accuracy of new wheelchair user predictions about their future wheelchair use.
DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of 84 community-dwelling veterans provided a new manual wheelchair.
RESULTS: The association between predicted and actual wheelchair use was strong at 3 mos (ϕ coefficient = 0.56), with 90% of those who anticipated using the wheelchair at 3 mos still using it (i.e., positive predictive value = 0.96) and 60% of those who anticipated not using it indeed no longer using the wheelchair (i.e., negative predictive value = 0.60, overall accuracy = 0.92). Predictive accuracy diminished over time, with overall accuracy declining from 0.92 at 3 mos to 0.66 at 6 mos. At all time points, and for all types of use, patients better predicted use as opposed to disuse, with correspondingly higher positive than negative predictive values. Accuracy of prediction of use in specific indoor and outdoor locations varied according to location.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of better understanding the potential mismatch between the anticipated and actual patterns of wheelchair use. The findings suggest that users can be relied upon to accurately predict their basic wheelchair-related needs in the short-term. Further exploration is needed to identify characteristics that will aid users and their providers in more accurately predicting mobility needs for the long-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22596074      PMCID: PMC3674830          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182555e4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  22 in total

1.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment.

Authors:  B Phillips; H Zhao
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  1993

2.  Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs.

Authors:  L A Cushman; M J Scherer
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  1996

3.  A clinical trial of a rehabilitation expert clinician versus usual care for providing manual wheelchairs.

Authors:  Helen Hoenig; Lawrence R Landerman; Kathy M Shipp; Carl Pieper; Carl Pieper; Margaret Richardson; Nancy Pahel; Linda George
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sheeba Rosewilliam; Carolyn Anne Roskell; A D Pandyan
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Assistive technology: problems and policy alternatives.

Authors:  B L O'Day; P J Corcoran
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives.

Authors:  Cheryl A Cott
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Wheelchair users are not necessarily wheelchair bound.

Authors:  Helen Hoenig; Carl Pieper; Mike Zolkewitz; Margaret Schenkman; Laurence G Branch
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Health-related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs: results from the Veterans Health Study.

Authors:  L E Kazis; D R Miller; J Clark; K Skinner; A Lee; W Rogers; A Spiro; S Payne; G Fincke; A Selim; M Linzer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-03-23

9.  Actigraphy as a measure of physical activity for wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catherine A Warms; Basia L Belza
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.

Authors:  Stephen P Sayers; Alan M Jette; Stephen M Haley; Tim C Heeren; Jack M Guralnik; Roger A Fielding
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Pain in patients with paraplegia].

Authors:  G Landmann; E-C Chang; W Dumat; A Lutz; R Müller; A Scheel-Sailer; K Schwerzmann; N Sigajew; A Ljutow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.