Literature DB >> 10171664

Predictors of assistive technology abandonment.

B Phillips1, H Zhao.   

Abstract

Technology abandonment may have serious repercussions for individuals with disabilities and for society. The purpose of this study was to determine how technology users decide to accept or reject assistive devices. Two hundred twenty-seven adults with various disabilities responded to a survey on device selection, acquisition, performance, and use. Results showed that 29.3% of all devices were completely abandoned. Mobility aids were more frequently abandoned than other categories of devices, and abandonment rates were highest during the first year and after 5 years of use. Four factors were significantly related to abandonment--lack of consideration of user opinion in selection, easy device procurement, poor device performance, and change in user needs or priorities. These findings suggest that technology-related policies and services need to emphasize consumer involvement and long-term needs of consumers to reduce device abandonment and enhance consumer satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10171664     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  63 in total

1.  The accuracy of new wheelchair users' predictions about their future wheelchair use.

Authors:  Helen Hoenig; Patricia Griffiths; Shanti Ganesh; Kevin Caves; Frances Harris
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Biomechanical effect of electromechanical knee-ankle-foot-orthosis on knee joint control in patients with poliomyelitis.

Authors:  Sungjae Hwang; Sungjae Kang; Kanghee Cho; Youngho Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Restoring standing capabilities with feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  One-year follow-up of Chinese people with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sam Chi Chung Chan; Alice Po Shan Chan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Disrupting the world of Disability: The Next Generation of Assistive Technologies and Rehabilitation Practices.

Authors:  Catherine Holloway; Helen Dawes
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-12-07

6.  SOLICITING BCI USER EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK FROM PEOPLE WITH SEVERE SPEECH AND PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS.

Authors:  Betts Peters; Aimee Mooney; Barry Oken; Melanie Fried-Oken
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2016-02-03

7.  The tongue enables computer and wheelchair control for people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jeonghee Kim; Hangue Park; Joy Bruce; Erica Sutton; Diane Rowles; Deborah Pucci; Jaimee Holbrook; Julia Minocha; Beatrice Nardone; Dennis West; Anne Laumann; Eliot Roth; Mike Jones; Emir Veledar; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.

Authors:  Brad E Dicianno; James Joseph; Stacy Eckstein; Christina K Zigler; Eleanor J Quinby; Mark R Schmeler; Richard M Schein; Jon Pearlman; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 9.  Research in computer access assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Richard Simpson; Heidi Horstmann Koester; Edmund Lopresti
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  A study on a shared control navigation system: human/robot collaboration for assisting people in mobility.

Authors:  Francesco Galluppi; Cristina Urdiales; Isabel Sanchez-Tato; Francisco Sandoval; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.