AIM: To evaluate the correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia and the results of the OGTT in diagnosing gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: The medical records of all consecutive women who had undergone a diagnostic OGTT, performed according to the IADPSG, during the past year were retrospectively reviewed. All first-trimester fasting glucose values greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), recommended as a diagnostic value, were also verified for each patient in this cohort. Moreover, a ROC curve and a multiple logistic-regression model were constructed to calculate the predictive capability of this cut-off value in diagnosing GDM. RESULTS: In our population of 738 eligible pregnant women, an 11.9% prevalence of GDM was revealed by OGTT. However, when the first-trimester fasting glucose value for each patient was retrospectively considered, there were a further 29 patients who should have been diagnosed as GDM cases (glycaemia ≥ 5.1 mmol/L), although their OGTT was normal. Yet, when the value of fasting glucose was considered not diagnostic, but only predictive, an AUC of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.544-0.684) and an aOR of 7.1 (95% CI: 3.8-13.1) was obtained in these patients compared with the reference group (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: There was no complete correspondence in diagnosing GDM between the first-trimester fasting glucose value and the results of a 2-h 75-g OGTT performed early in the third trimester. However, albeit not diagnostic, a fasting glucose value greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L may be considered a highly predictive risk factor for GDM.
AIM: To evaluate the correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia and the results of the OGTT in diagnosing gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: The medical records of all consecutive women who had undergone a diagnostic OGTT, performed according to the IADPSG, during the past year were retrospectively reviewed. All first-trimester fasting glucose values greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), recommended as a diagnostic value, were also verified for each patient in this cohort. Moreover, a ROC curve and a multiple logistic-regression model were constructed to calculate the predictive capability of this cut-off value in diagnosing GDM. RESULTS: In our population of 738 eligible pregnant women, an 11.9% prevalence of GDM was revealed by OGTT. However, when the first-trimester fasting glucose value for each patient was retrospectively considered, there were a further 29 patients who should have been diagnosed as GDM cases (glycaemia ≥ 5.1 mmol/L), although their OGTT was normal. Yet, when the value of fasting glucose was considered not diagnostic, but only predictive, an AUC of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.544-0.684) and an aOR of 7.1 (95% CI: 3.8-13.1) was obtained in these patients compared with the reference group (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: There was no complete correspondence in diagnosing GDM between the first-trimester fasting glucose value and the results of a 2-h 75-g OGTT performed early in the third trimester. However, albeit not diagnostic, a fasting glucose value greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L may be considered a highly predictive risk factor for GDM.
Authors: Maisa N Feghali; Kaleab Z Abebe; Diane M Comer; Steve Caritis; Janet M Catov; Christina M Scifres Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: P Kaitlyn Edelson; Kaitlyn E James; Aaron Leong; Juliana Arenas; Melody Cayford; Michael J Callahan; Sarah N Bernstein; Jessica Sheehan Tangren; Marie-France Hivert; John M Higgins; David M Nathan; Camille E Powe Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Milana A Bochkur Dratver; Juliana Arenas; Tanayott Thaweethai; Chu Yu; Kaitlyn James; Emily A Rosenberg; Michael J Callahan; Melody Cayford; Jessica S Tangren; Sarah N Bernstein; Marie France Hivert; Ravi Thadhani; Camille E Powe Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Tina Ravnsborg; Lise Lotte T Andersen; Natacha D Trabjerg; Lars M Rasmussen; Dorte M Jensen; Martin Overgaard Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Deborah J Wexler; Camille E Powe; Linda A Barbour; Thomas Buchanan; Donald R Coustan; Rosa Corcoy; Peter Damm; Fidelma Dunne; Denice S Feig; Assiamira Ferrara; Lorie M Harper; Mark B Landon; Sara J Meltzer; Boyd E Metzger; Hilary Roeder; Janet A Rowan; David A Sacks; David Simmons; Jason G Umans; Patrick M Catalano Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Emily A Rosenberg; Ellen W Seely; Kaitlyn James; Juliana Arenas; Michael J Callahan; Melody Cayford; Stacey Nelson; Sarah N Bernstein; Ravi Thadhani; Camille E Powe Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2021-05-23 Impact factor: 8.180