Literature DB >> 22592914

Functional outcome of limb salvage surgery with mega-endoprosthetic reconstruction for bone tumors.

Irfan Qadir1, Masood Umer, Naveed Baloch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of a mega-endoprosthesis has become the method of choice for reconstruction after bone tumors. In this study, we sought to determine the functional outcome and complications associated with mega-endoprosthesis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts of 16 patients who had undergone resection of bone tumors followed by reconstruction with mega-endoprosthesis between 2006 and 2011 was performed. Functional evaluation was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. Complications of the procedures were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Eight men and eight women at an average age of 36.7 years were included in the study. The tumor involved lower limb in 14 patients and upper limb in 2 patients. The average MSTS functional score was 72.3 ± 15. Excellent results were achieved in six patients, good in five, moderate and fair in two each and poor in one. Complications occurred in eight patients. Two patients had aseptic loosening of the femoral component of total knee replacement. Flap necrosis occurred in two patients, both of whom required latissimus dorsi free flap for coverage of total knee prosthesis. One patient underwent revision of femoral component subsequent to knee dissociation. Local recurrence of tumor, patellar tendon rupture and foot drop occurred in one patient each.
CONCLUSION: Mega-endoprosthetic reconstruction in limb salvage provides good functional outcome in patients with bone tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22592914     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1542-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Implant and limb survival after resection of primary bone tumors of the lower extremities and reconstruction with mega-prostheses fifty patients followed for a mean of forteen years.

Authors:  Christina Enciso Holm; Christian Bardram; Anja Falk Riecke; Peter Horstmann; Michael Mørk Petersen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Establishing musculoskeletal oncology service in resource constrained country: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Obada Hasan; Akbar Zubairi; Zohaib Nawaz; Masood Umer
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with limb salvage surgery in patients with limb osteosarcoma of Enneking stage II: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Guangke Yuan; Jingming Chen; Dongjin Wu; Chunzheng Gao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Which factors are associated with the functional recovery in patients undergoing endoprosthetic knee reconstruction following bone tumour resection? - A observational study.

Authors:  Mattia Morri; Debora Raffa; Daniela Vigna; Maria Barbieri; Elisabetta Mariani; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2018-12-29

Review 5.  Bone cement as a local chemotherapeutic drug delivery carrier in orthopedic oncology: A review.

Authors:  Sunjeev S Phull; Alireza Rahimnejad Yazdi; Michelle Ghert; Mark R Towler
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  Modular cementless prosthetic reconstruction after resection of lower extremity malignant tumor.

Authors:  Senol Bekmez; Mehmet Ayvaz; Altug Yucekul; Mazhar Tokgozoglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Postoperative function recovery in patients with endoprosthetic knee replacement for bone tumour: an observational study.

Authors:  Mattia Morri; Cristiana Forni; Riccardo Ruisi; Tiziana Giamboi; Fabrizio Giacomella; Davide Maria Donati; Maria Grazia Benedetti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.