BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have established the benefit of medical therapy and revascularization in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the 2 most common diseases worldwide. In clinical practice, cancer patients are frequently afflicted with MI. The benefit of medical and/or revascularization therapy in the cancer population with MI is less well known. HYPOTHESIS: Medical and revascularization therapy reduces mortality in cancer patients with MI. METHODS: After approval by the institutional review board, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI who were admitted to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between December 2000 and October 2006 and evaluated the association between cardiac treatments with survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 456 patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were identified and included in the study, of which 386 had non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) and 70 had ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Compared with patients with NSTEMI, patients who had STEMI were more often prescribed aspirin (66% vs 43%; P = 0.004), β-blockers (61% vs 46%; P = 0.018), and thrombolytic therapy (9% vs 0.3%; P = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, aspirin use was associated with a 23% decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.98, P = 0.033) and β-blocker use was associated with a 36% decreased risk of death (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P = 0.0002). Statins (HR: 0.82, P = 0.18) and catheter-based revascularization (HR: 0.57, P = 0.09) did not have an impact on the risk of death. Compared with patients with limited cancer, advanced cancer patients were twice as likely to die (HR: 2.12, 95 CI: 1.47-3.04, P < 0.0001). Previous chemotherapy (P = 0.005) and chest radiotherapy (P = 0.017) were associated with increased 1-year mortality, whereas hyperlipidemia (P = 0.018) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of cancer patients with MI, medical therapy with aspirin and β-blockers was associated with improved survival. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have established the benefit of medical therapy and revascularization in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the 2 most common diseases worldwide. In clinical practice, cancerpatients are frequently afflicted with MI. The benefit of medical and/or revascularization therapy in the cancer population with MI is less well known. HYPOTHESIS: Medical and revascularization therapy reduces mortality in cancerpatients with MI. METHODS: After approval by the institutional review board, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI who were admitted to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between December 2000 and October 2006 and evaluated the association between cardiac treatments with survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 456 patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were identified and included in the study, of which 386 had non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) and 70 had ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Compared with patients with NSTEMI, patients who had STEMI were more often prescribed aspirin (66% vs 43%; P = 0.004), β-blockers (61% vs 46%; P = 0.018), and thrombolytic therapy (9% vs 0.3%; P = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, aspirin use was associated with a 23% decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.98, P = 0.033) and β-blocker use was associated with a 36% decreased risk of death (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P = 0.0002). Statins (HR: 0.82, P = 0.18) and catheter-based revascularization (HR: 0.57, P = 0.09) did not have an impact on the risk of death. Compared with patients with limited cancer, advanced cancerpatients were twice as likely to die (HR: 2.12, 95 CI: 1.47-3.04, P < 0.0001). Previous chemotherapy (P = 0.005) and chest radiotherapy (P = 0.017) were associated with increased 1-year mortality, whereas hyperlipidemia (P = 0.018) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of cancerpatients with MI, medical therapy with aspirin and β-blockers was associated with improved survival. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Authors: J E Naschitz; D Yeshurun; J Abrahamson; S Eldar; H Chouri; S Kedar; M Weinberger; E G Goldhammer; L Lev; N Egoz Journal: Cancer Date: 1992-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M T Meinardi; J A Gietema; W T van der Graaf; D J van Veldhuisen; M A Runne; W J Sluiter; E G de Vries; P B Willemse; N H Mulder; M P van den Berg; H S Koops; D T Sleijfer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mona G Sarkiss; S Wamique Yusuf; Carla L Warneke; Gregory Botz; Nasser Lakkis; Cheryl Hirch-Ginsburg; J Chris Champion; Joseph Swafford; Andrew D S Shaw; Daniel J Lenihan; Jean-Bernard Durand Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dana Elena Giza; Fernando Boccalandro; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Gloria Iliescu; Kaveh Karimzad; Peter Kim; Cezar Iliescu Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-05
Authors: Saamir A Hassan; Nicolas Palaskas; Peter Kim; Cezar Iliescu; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Elie Mouhayar; Rohit Mougdil; Kara Thompson; Jose Banchs; Syed Wamique Yusuf Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.113