Literature DB >> 22588528

Evaluation of an integrated intensive care unit monitoring display by critical care fellow physicians.

Matthias Görges1, Dwayne R Westenskow, Boaz A Markewitz.   

Abstract

In the past two far-view displays, which showed vital signs, trends, alarms, infusion pump status, and therapy support indicators, were developed and assessed by critical care nurses (Görges et al. in Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 30(4):206-17, 2011). The aim of the current study is to assess the generalizability of these findings to physicians. The first aim is to test whether an integrated far-view display, designed to be readable from 3 to 5 m, enables critical care physicians to more rapidly and accurately (1) recognize a change in patient condition; (2) identify alarms; and (3) identify near-empty infusion pumps, than a traditional patient monitor and infusion pump. A second aim is to test if the new displays reduce the mental workload required for this decision making. Fifteen critical care fellow physicians (median age of 34 years, with 2-8 years of ICU experience) were asked to use the three displays to compare the data from two patients and decide which patient required their attention first. Each physician made 60 decisions: 20 with each of the two far-view displays and 20 decisions with a standard patient monitor next to an infusion pump. A 41 and 26 % improvement in decision accuracy was observed with the bar and clock far-view displays, respectively. Specifically, the identification of near empty infusion pumps, a task normally performed by nurses, and patients with a single alarm were better with the new displays. Using the bar display physicians made their decision 12 % faster than when using the control display, a median improvement of 2.1 s. No significant differences were observed in measured workload. Displays that present patient data in a redesigned format enables critical care clinicians to more rapidly identify changes in patient conditions and to more accurately decide which patient needs their attention. In a clinical setting, this could improve patient safety. In future work, an evaluation of the display using live patient data from an ICU should be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588528     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9370-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  9 in total

Review 1.  The right picture is worth a thousand numbers: data displays in anesthesia.

Authors:  Frank A Drews; Dwayne R Westenskow
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Improving alarm performance in the medical intensive care unit using delays and clinical context.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Boaz A Markewitz; Dwayne R Westenskow
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Visual cueing with context relevant information for reducing change blindness.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Tappan; Jeremy Daniels; Brad Slavin; Joanne Lim; Rollin Brant; J Mark Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A far-view intensive care unit monitoring display enables faster triage.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Kai Kück; Sven H Koch; Jim Agutter; Dwayne R Westenskow
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  The hostile environment of the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yoel Donchin; F Jacob Seagull
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Multicentric study of monitoring alarms in the adult intensive care unit (ICU): a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  M C Chambrin; P Ravaux; D Calvelo-Aros; A Jaborska; C Chopin; B Boniface
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Evaluation of a pulmonary graphical display in the medical intensive care unit: an observational study.

Authors:  S Blake Wachter; Boaz Markewitz; Robert Rose; Dwayne Westenskow
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 9.  Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Patient information organization in the intensive care setting: expert knowledge elicitation with card sorting methods.

Authors:  Thomas Reese; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rosalie Waller; Brekk C Macpherson; Joseph E Tonna; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  An exploratory clinical evaluation of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists' situation awareness.

Authors:  Paul D Schlosser; Tobias Grundgeiger; Penelope M Sanderson; Oliver Happel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The proportion of clinically relevant alarms decreases as patient clinical severity decreases in intensive care units: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryota Inokuchi; Hajime Sato; Yuko Nanjo; Masahiro Echigo; Aoi Tanaka; Takeshi Ishii; Takehiro Matsubara; Kent Doi; Masataka Gunshin; Takahiro Hiruma; Kensuke Nakamura; Kazuaki Shinohara; Yoichi Kitsuta; Susumu Nakajima; Mitsuo Umezu; Naoki Yahagi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  A Review of Visual Representations of Physiologic Data.

Authors:  Rishikesan Kamaleswaran; Carolyn McGregor
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-21

5.  "Usability of data integration and visualization software for multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care: a human factors approach to assessing technology".

Authors:  Ying Ling Lin; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Jessica Tomasi; Peter Laussen; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 6.  Novel Interface Designs for Patient Monitoring Applications in Critical Care Medicine: Human Factors Review.

Authors:  Evismar Andrade; Leo Quinlan; Richard Harte; Dara Byrne; Enda Fallon; Martina Kelly; Siobhan Casey; Frank Kirrane; Paul O'Connor; Denis O'Hora; Michael Scully; John Laffey; Patrick Pladys; Alain Beuchée; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2020-07-03

7.  Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Melanie C Wright; Damian Borbolla; Rosalie G Waller; Guilherme Del Fiol; Thomas Reese; Paige Nesbitt; Noa Segall
Journal:  J Biomed Inform X       Date:  2019-06-22

8.  Association of Data Integration Technologies With Intensive Care Clinician Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Ling Lin; Patricia Trbovich; Lauren Kolodzey; Cheri Nickel; Anne-Marie Guerguerian
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-05-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.