Literature DB >> 16696257

The right picture is worth a thousand numbers: data displays in anesthesia.

Frank A Drews1, Dwayne R Westenskow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on data displays in anesthesia identifying issues and developing design recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Unexpected incidents are common in critical care medicine. Adverse outcomes are frequently the catastrophic endpoints of an "evolving" chain of subtle incidents. One strategy to reduce the likelihood of an adverse patient outcome during anesthesia is to improve the anesthesiologist's ability to detect, diagnose, and treat critical incidents.
METHOD: A literature review and analysis of data displays.
RESULTS: Current numerical and waveform displays do not support anesthesiologists optimally. An alternative is graphical displays that functionally integrate variables into objects. In a well-designed graphic object, deviations from normal are shown by distortions in the object's symmetry. The emerging patterns that result from distorted symmetry facilitate the correct diagnosis. When treatment is effective, an object's shape is restored to normal. Graphical displays can be an effective tool in supporting anesthesiologists' situation awareness.
CONCLUSION: Problems related to graphical displays have delayed their use in anesthesia, including the lack of conclusive clinical evidence of their value. However, currently more evidence is accumulating that graphical displays have the potential to improve clinical performance. The successful development of these graphical displays takes into account task requirements, a user's perceptual processes, and task-specific cognition. APPLICATION: This paper provides suggestions for the development of more effective displays in anesthesiology. Graphical displays can increase the anesthesiologist's situation awareness and improve clinical performance. Clinical use of these displays has the potential to significantly improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696257     DOI: 10.1518/001872006776412270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  22 in total

1.  Guiding Principles for a Pediatric Neurology ICU (neuroPICU) Bedside Multimodal Monitor: Findings from an International Working Group.

Authors:  Zachary M Grinspan; Yonina C Eldar; Daniel Gopher; Amihai Gottlieb; Rotem Lammfromm; Halinder S Mangat; Nimrod Peleg; Steven Pon; Igal Rozenberg; Nicholas D Schiff; David E Stark; Peter Yan; Hillel Pratt; Barry E Kosofsky
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Sketching Awareness: A Participatory Study to Elicit Designs for Supporting Ad Hoc Emergency Medical Teamwork.

Authors:  Diana Kusunoki; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Zhan Zhang; Maria Yala
Journal:  Comput Support Coop Work       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.825

3.  Debunking health IT usability myths.

Authors:  N Staggers; Y Xiao; L Chapman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Visual cueing with context relevant information for reducing change blindness.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Tappan; Jeremy Daniels; Brad Slavin; Joanne Lim; Rollin Brant; J Mark Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalie G Waller; Melanie C Wright; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Thomas Reese; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Closed loop mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Marc Wysocki; Philippe Jouvet; Samir Jaber
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  The Effect of Information Analysis Automation Display Content on Human Judgment Performance in Noisy Environments.

Authors:  Ellen J Bass; Leigh A Baumgart; Kathryn Klein Shepley
Journal:  J Cogn Eng Decis Mak       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Effect of pooled comparative information on judgments of quality.

Authors:  Leigh A Baumgart; Ellen J Bass; John D Voss; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.