Literature DB >> 22588139

Transischioanal trans-sacrospinous ligament rectocele repair with polypropylene mesh: a prospective study with assessment of rectoanal function.

Pascal Mourtialon1, Vincent Letouzey, Georges Eglin, Renaud de Tayrac.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite good anatomical outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair by the vaginal route using synthetic mesh, complications limit their use. Clinical data are needed to generalize prolapse mesh repair by the vaginal route. The current study aims to evaluate midterm rectoanal function and clinical outcomes after transischioanal rectocele repair using a medium weight polypropylene mesh.
METHODS: Between March 2003 and June 2004, 230 patients with stage II-IV anterior and/or posterior POP were included in a prospective multicenter study. The current study is based on the analysis of the 116 patients who underwent a rectocele repair via the infracoccygeal route through the sacrospinous ligament. Anatomical cure was defined when rectocele was at stage <II in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Postoperative functional results were evaluated using the self-administered Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ).
RESULTS: Of the 116 patients who received a posterior mesh with two arms via the infracoccygeal route through the sacrospinous ligament, midterm anatomical results were available for 78 women representing 67 % (78/116) of the operated patients. The mean follow-up was 36 (± 8.1) months. No rectal injury occurred during surgery. The objective success rate was 94.8 % and subjective (by patient satisfaction) was 93.23 %. Colorectal-Anal Impact (CRAI) and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) scores were both significantly decreased at midterm follow-up in comparison with baseline (42.7 at baseline vs 11.4 at 24- or 36-month follow-up, p = 0.001 for CRAI, and 81.1 vs 34.4, p < 0.001 for CRADI) highlighting the benefits of rectocele repair on colorectal-anal function.
CONCLUSIONS: Polypropylene mesh with two arms via the infracoccygeal route through the sacrospinous ligament has good anatomical results at midterm follow-up with significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life and is associated with few complications. Obstructive symptoms reported in cases of rectocele can be improved by transvaginal mesh repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588139     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1813-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  30 in total

1.  [Transobturator subvesical mesh. Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series].

Authors:  G Eglin; J M Ska; X Serres
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2003-01

2.  Comparison of clinical outcome and urodynamic findings using "Perigee and/or Apogee" versus "Prolift anterior and/or posterior" system devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Long; Chun-Shuo Hsu; Mei-Yu Jang; Cheng-Min Liu; Po-Hui Chiang; Eing-Mei Tsai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Matthew D Barber; Ingrid Nygaard; Charlie W Nager; Edward Varner; Joseph Schaffer; Anthony Visco; Susan Meikle; Cathie Spino
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh.

Authors:  A Vollebregt; K Fischer; D Gietelink; C H van der Vaart
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 6.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

7.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Amélie Gervaise; Aurélia Chauveaud; Hervé Fernandez
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  [Development of a linguistically validated French version of two short-form, condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7)].

Authors:  R de Tayrac; B Deval; H Fernandez; P Marès
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2007-09-18

10.  Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reijo Hiltunen; Kari Nieminen; Teuvo Takala; Eila Heiskanen; Mauri Merikari; Kirsti Niemi; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.