Literature DB >> 22587962

The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research.

Sally Davies1.   

Abstract

An important activity of the National Institute for Health Research is to commission and support the preparation of systematic reviews. For research commissioners, the international prospective register for systematic reviews known as PROSPERO provides an important further step in ensuring the quality and integrity of research evidence and will help avoid unplanned research duplication.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22587962      PMCID： PMC3348668          DOI： 10.1186/2046-4053-1-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Rev        ISSN： 2046-4053


  1 in total

Review 1.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321
  1 in total
  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results.

Authors:  Sergio Barrichello; Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata; Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Thiago Ferreira de Souza; Manoel Galvão Neto; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Marco Aurélio Santo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

3.  Association of blood pressure, obesity and physical activity with arterial stiffness in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giulia Lona; Christoph Hauser; Sabrina Köchli; Denis Infanger; Katharina Endes; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Henner Hanssen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Pathophysiological mechanisms of root resorption after dental trauma: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Kerstin M Galler; Eva-Maria Grätz; Matthias Widbiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Helge Knüttel
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense.

Authors:  Lesley Stewart; David Moher; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-09

6.  Is There Any Role for Opioids in the Management of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mikala C Osani; L Stefan Lohmander; Raveendhara R Bannuru
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.178

7.  PRISMA statement and PROSPERO.

Authors:  Wanderley Marques Bernardo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Liang-Liang Cheng; Yu Liu; Peng-Li Jia; Ming-Yue Gao; Chao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.

Authors:  Yasushi Tsujimoto; Yusuke Tsutsumi; Yuki Kataoka; Hiraku Tsujimoto; Yosuke Yamamoto; Davide Papola; Gordon H Guyatt; Shunichi Fukuhara; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.