| Literature DB >> 22586500 |
Oh Yoen Kim1, Hye Kyung Chung, Min-Jeong Shin.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the influencing factors that characterize low density lipoprotein (LDL) phenotype and the levels of LDL particle size in healthy Korean women. In 57 healthy Korean women (mean age, 57.4 ± 13.1 yrs), anthropometric and biochemical parameters such as lipid profiles and LDL particle size were measured. Dietary intake was estimated by a developed semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The study subjects were divided into two groups: LDL phenotype A (mean size: 269.7Å, n = 44) and LDL phenotype B (mean size: 248.2Å, n = 13). Basic characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The phenotype B group had a higher body mass index, higher serum levels of triglyceride, total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo)B, and apoCIII but lower levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and LDL particle size than those of the phenotype A group. LDL particle size was negatively correlated with serum levels of triglyceride (r = -0.732, P < 0.001), total-cholesterol, apoB, and apoCIII, as well as carbohydrate intake (%En) and positively correlated with serum levels of HDL-cholesterol and ApoA1 and fat intake (%En). A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that carbohydrate intake (%En) and serum triglyceride levels were the primary factors influencing LDL particle size (P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.577). This result confirmed that LDL particle size was closely correlated with circulating triglycerides and demonstrated that particle size is significantly associated with dietary carbohydrate in Korean women.Entities:
Keywords: LDL particle size; LDL phenotype; dietary carbohydrate; triglyceride
Year: 2012 PMID: 22586500 PMCID: PMC3349033 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2012.6.2.120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between phenotypes A and B
Mean ± SD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001: P-values < 0.05 indicate significant differences in the variables between the two groups (phenotype A vs. phenotype B), which were evaluated by Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.
1)alcohol use, exercise and postmenopause were expressed as numbers and % of subjects who answered positively to these questions (n, %: yes).
BMI, body mass index; NS, not significant
Fig. 1Distribution of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size in all study subjects (LDL phenotypes A and B). LDL phenotype A group (mean size: 269.7 Å, n = 44), subjects with buoyant-mode profiles [peak LDL particle diameter ≥ 264 Å] including intermediate LDL subclass pattern [256 Å≤ peak LDL particle diameter ≤ 263 Å]; LDL phenotype B group (mean size: 248.2 Å, n = 13), subjects with dense-mode profiles [peak LDL particle diameter ≤ 255 Å]
Comparisons of energy and nutrient intakes between phenotypes A and B
Mean ± SD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01: P-values < 0.05 indicate statistically significant differences in the variables between the two groups (phenotype A vs. phenotype B), which were evaluated by Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Carbohydrate (%En), protein (%En), and fat (%En): percent of energy intake for dietary carbohydrate, protein, and fat, respectively.
Correlations between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size and selected macronutrient intakes and biochemical measurements
Tested by Pearson's correlation (r0) or partial correlation (r1) analysis
r0, unadjusted correlation coefficient; r1, correlation coefficient adjusted by serum triglycerides
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001: P-values < 0.05 indicate statistical significance. Carbohydrate (%En), protein (%En), and fat (%En): percent of energy intake from dietary carbohydrate, protein, and fat, respectively.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis to identify factors influencing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size levels
Independent variables in the regression models, included baseline characteristics (i.e., age, BMI, menopause, exercise, alcohol consumption), lipid profiles (i.e., TG, HDL-cholesterol, and apolipoproteins) and macronutrient intake [carbohydrate (%En) and fat (%En)].
Carbohydrate (%En) and fat (%En): percent of energy intake from dietary carbohydrate and fat, respectively