PURPOSE: As imaging of the cell surface tetraspan protein epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) expression in malignant tumors may provide important prognostic and predictive diagnostic information, the goal of this study is to determine if antibody fragments to EMP2 may be useful for imaging EMP2 positive tumors. PROCEDURES: The normal tissue distribution of EMP2 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and found to be discretely expressed in both mouse and human tissues. To detect EMP2 in tumors, a recombinant human anti-EMP2 minibody (scFv-hinge-C(H)3 dimer; 80 kDa) was designed to recognize a common epitope in mice and humans and characterized. In human tumor cell lines, the antibody binding induced EMP2 internalization and degradation, prompting the need for a residualizing imaging strategy. Following conjugation to DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N',N'″-tetraacetic acid), the minibody was radiolabeled with (64)Cu (t (1/2) = 12.7 h) and evaluated in mice as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent for human EMP2-expressing endometrial tumor xenografts. RESULTS: The residualizing agent, (64)Cu-DOTA anti-EMP2 minibody, achieved high uptake in endometrial cancer xenografts overexpressing EMP2 (10.2 ± 2.6, percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) ± SD) with moderate uptake in wild-type HEC1A tumors (6.0 ± 0.1). In both cases, precise tumor delineation was observed from the PET images. In contrast, low uptake was observed with anti-EMP2 minibodies in EMP2-negative tumors (1.9 ± 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: This new immune-PET agent may be useful for preclinical assessment of anti-EMP2 targeting in vivo. It may also have value for imaging of tumor localization and therapeutic response in patients with EMP2-positive malignancies.
PURPOSE: As imaging of the cell surface tetraspan protein epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) expression in malignant tumors may provide important prognostic and predictive diagnostic information, the goal of this study is to determine if antibody fragments to EMP2 may be useful for imaging EMP2 positive tumors. PROCEDURES: The normal tissue distribution of EMP2 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and found to be discretely expressed in both mouse and human tissues. To detect EMP2 in tumors, a recombinant human anti-EMP2 minibody (scFv-hinge-C(H)3 dimer; 80 kDa) was designed to recognize a common epitope in mice and humans and characterized. In humantumor cell lines, the antibody binding induced EMP2 internalization and degradation, prompting the need for a residualizing imaging strategy. Following conjugation to DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N',N'″-tetraacetic acid), the minibody was radiolabeled with (64)Cu (t (1/2) = 12.7 h) and evaluated in mice as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent for humanEMP2-expressing endometrial tumor xenografts. RESULTS: The residualizing agent, (64)Cu-DOTA anti-EMP2 minibody, achieved high uptake in endometrial cancer xenografts overexpressing EMP2 (10.2 ± 2.6, percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) ± SD) with moderate uptake in wild-type HEC1A tumors (6.0 ± 0.1). In both cases, precise tumor delineation was observed from the PET images. In contrast, low uptake was observed with anti-EMP2 minibodies in EMP2-negative tumors (1.9 ± 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: This new immune-PET agent may be useful for preclinical assessment of anti-EMP2 targeting in vivo. It may also have value for imaging of tumor localization and therapeutic response in patients with EMP2-positive malignancies.
Authors: Adam F Prasanphanich; Lauren Retzloff; Stephanie R Lane; Prasant K Nanda; Gary L Sieckman; Tammy L Rold; Lixin Ma; Said D Figueroa; Samantha V Sublett; Timothy J Hoffman; Charles J Smith Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Ursula Elsässer-Beile; Gerald Reischl; Stefan Wiehr; Patrick Bühler; Philipp Wolf; Karen Alt; John Shively; Martin S Judenhofer; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Bernd J Pichler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jennifer E Sprague; Yijie Peng; Ashley L Fiamengo; Katrina S Woodin; Evan A Southwick; Gary R Weisman; Edward H Wong; James A Golen; Arnold L Rheingold; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Rebecca A Dumont; Isabel Hildebrandt; Helen Su; Roland Haubner; Gerald Reischl; Johannes G Czernin; Paul S Mischel; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Shawn A Morales; Sergey Mareninov; Madhuri Wadehra; Lily Zhang; Lee Goodglick; Jonathan Braun; Lynn K Gordon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kaori Shimazaki; Eric J Lepin; Bo Wei; Agnes K Nagy; Catherine P Coulam; Sergey Mareninov; Maoyong Fu; Anna M Wu; James D Marks; Jonathan Braun; Lynn K Gordon; Madhuri Wadehra Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Adam F Prasanphanich; Prasant K Nanda; Tammy L Rold; Lixin Ma; Michael R Lewis; Jered C Garrison; Timothy J Hoffman; Gary L Sieckman; Said D Figueroa; Charles J Smith Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Keyu Li; Richard Tavaré; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Shannon M Mumenthaler; Parag Mallick; Yu Zhou; James D Marks; Anna M Wu Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Maoyong Fu; Erin L Maresh; Gustavo F Helguera; Meagan Kiyohara; Yu Qin; Negin Ashki; Tracy R Daniels-Wells; Najib Aziz; Lynn K Gordon; Jonathan Braun; Yahya Elshimali; Robert A Soslow; Manuel L Penichet; Lee Goodglick; Madhuri Wadehra Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Michel M Sun; Ann M Chan; Samuel M Law; Sergio Duarte; Daniel Diaz-Aguilar; Madhuri Wadehra; Lynn K Gordon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michael D Donnan; Rizaldy P Scott; Tuncer Onay; Antoine Tarjus; Ummiye Venus Onay; Susan E Quaggin Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2019-08-27