Literature DB >> 22585357

Acceptability, validity and reliability of the Turkish QUALIOST(®) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Simin Hepguler1, Funda Calis Atamaz, Yelda Pinar, Cihat Ozturk.   

Abstract

The quality-of-life questionnaire in osteoporosis (QUALIOST(®)) is commonly used and accepted generic instrument in osteoporosis. This study aimed to translate QUALIOST(®) into Turkish language and assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). After the questionnaire was translated into Turkish, it was administered to 110 with PMO. The reliability studies were assessed by test-retest reliability (ICC) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha). Construct validity was assessed by using correlating QUALIOST(®) with SF-36. Results showed that ICC values were 0.92, 0.91 and 0.92, for physical domain, emotional domain and total QUALIOST(®) scores, respectively. Similarly, Cronbach's alpha was acceptable in all domains (0.85, 0.83 and 0.84, respectively). Significant moderate-to-high correlations were obtained between QUALIOST(®) and SF-36 dimensions (r value between -0.39 and -0.72, p < 0.001). Also, there were moderate-high correlations between the domains of questionnaire and pain intensity and disease duration (r value between 0.35 and 0.45, p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study, which reported firstly psychometric properties and usefulness of the Turkish QUALIOST(®), showed that it is a potentially useful measure with a high validity and reliability standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22585357     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-012-2443-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  17 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.

Authors:  E M Andresen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

4.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Development and validation of a specific quality of life module in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: the QUALIOST.

Authors:  P Marquis; P Cialdella; C De la Loge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Significance of osteoporosis: a growing international health care problem.

Authors:  L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Pain and disability associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Cross-cultural validation and analysis of responsiveness of the QUALIOST: QUAlity of Life questionnaire In OSTeoporosis.

Authors:  Christine de la Loge; Kate Sullivan; Robert Pinkney; Patrick Marquis; Christian Roux; Pierre Jean Meunier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.