Literature DB >> 22584920

Maximum urethral closure pressure in women: normative data and evaluation as a diagnostic test.

Dharmesh S Kapoor1, Fadi Housami, Paul White, Lucy Swithinbank, Marcus Drake.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our goal was to identify correlates of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and MUCP as a diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of women with non-neurological referrals for urinary incontinence between1995 and 2006.
RESULTS: We studied the characteristics of 8,644 women who underwent urodynamics for non-neurological referrals. Mean MUCP was 48 cm H(2)O in urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), 50 cm H(2)O in mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), 65 cm H(2)O in detrusor overactivity incontinence (DOI) and 67 cm H(2)O for continent women . Age and MUCP were negatively correlated in all groups. Multiple regression analysis showed lower levels of MUCP in women with USI who also had previous hysterectomy or anti-incontinence surgery or who were in an older age group. Previous anti-incontinence surgery and older age were risk factors for lower MUCP in women with MUI and DOI. Receiver operator curves did not show MUCP to have utility as a diagnostic test despite age and parity stratification. MUCP < 20 cm H(2)O showed a sensitivity of 5 % and specificity of 98 % in diagnosing USI.
CONCLUSIONS: MUCP failed to meet the criteria for a diagnostic test. Women with USI and MUI have lower MUCP than women with DOI and continent women in each decade of life. MUCP decreases with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584920     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1770-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

Review 1.  Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  A M Weber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  Low-pressure urethra in women: what does it mean and what can it be used for?

Authors:  G Lose; S Brostrøm
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

3.  Diagnosing intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: comparing urethral closure pressure, urethral axis, and Valsalva leak point pressures.

Authors:  R C Bump; K W Coates; G W Cundiff; R L Harris; A C Weidner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology.

Authors:  P Abrams; J G Blaivas; S L Stanton; J T Andersen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1988

5.  The urethral pressure profile: theoretical considerations and clinical application.

Authors:  L Edwards; J Malvern
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1974-06

6.  The effect of vesical volume on Valsalva leak-point pressures in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J P Theofrastous; G W Cundiff; R L Harris; R C Bump
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The urethral pressure profiles in continent and stress-incontinent women.

Authors:  L Henriksson; K E Andersson; U Ulmsten
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1979

8.  Is the leak point pressure alone an accurate indicator of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency?

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Patrick J Culligan; Carol A Graham; Kari M Kubik; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-08

9.  The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women.

Authors:  Mathias H-D Pfisterer; Derek J Griffiths; Werner Schaefer; Neil M Resnick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Clinical and urodynamic features of intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  Cinzia Pajoncini; Elisabetta Costantini; Federico Guercini; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Influence of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and pelvic floor muscle training on urethral closure pressures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maria Zubieta; Rebecca L Carr; Marcus J Drake; Kari Bø
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Levator ani defects in patients with stress urinary incontinence: three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment.

Authors:  Aparna Hegde; Vivian C Aguilar; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Incontinence in the elderly, 'normal' ageing, or unaddressed pathology?

Authors:  William Gibson; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  A comparative study of a single-incision sling and a transobturator sling: clinical efficacy and urodynamic changes.

Authors:  Mou-Jong Sun; Ryan Sun; Yi-Ing Li
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Classification of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Odunayo Kalejaiye; Monika Vij; Marcus John Drake
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Measurement of dynamic urethral pressures with a high-resolution manometry system in continent and incontinent women.

Authors:  Anna C Kirby; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Charles W Nager
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Outcome of coexistent overactive bladder symptoms in women with urodynamic urinary incontinence following anti-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Liang; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; LuLu Huang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  THE CASE AGAINST urethral failure is not a critical factor in female urinary incontinence. Now what? The integral theory system.

Authors:  Peter Petros
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 2.367

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.