Literature DB >> 1925153

Validation techniques for logistic regression models.

M E Miller1, S L Hui, W M Tierney.   

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive approach to the validation of logistic prediction models. It reviews measures of overall goodness-of-fit, and indices of calibration and refinement. Using a model-based approach developed by Cox, we adapt logistic regression diagnostic techniques for use in model validation. This allows identification of problematic predictor variables in the prediction model as well as influential observations in the validation data that adversely affect the fit of the model. In appropriate situations, recommendations are made for correction of models that provide poor fit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1925153     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780100805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  49 in total

1.  Diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders: interobserver agreement and determinants of disagreement.

Authors:  A F de Winter; M P Jans; R J Scholten; W Devillé; D van Schaardenburg; L M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Evaluating prognostic factors: implications for measurement of health care outcome.

Authors:  M C Gulliford
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Rates of surgical site infection as a performance measure: Are we ready?

Authors:  Fernando Martín Biscione
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

5.  Baseline predictors of health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a longitudinal analysis of a multicenter cohort at two and six years.

Authors:  Warren R Dunn; Brian R Wolf; Frank E Harrell; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models-Part I: Overview of Current Methods.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Maria L Marco; James P Hughes; Nancy L Keim; Mary E Kable
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?

Authors:  Daniele Poole; Carlotta Rossi; Nicola Latronico; Giancarlo Rossi; Stefano Finazzi; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Detection of early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with thrombospondin-2 and CA19-9 blood markers.

Authors:  Jungsun Kim; William R Bamlet; Ann L Oberg; Kari G Chaffee; Greg Donahue; Xing-Jun Cao; Suresh Chari; Benjamin A Garcia; Gloria M Petersen; Kenneth S Zaret
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Dieter H Beck; Gary B Smith; John V Pappachan; Brian Millar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Validation in a multiple urology practice cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for predicting prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Stephen J Eyre; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Prakash V Nair; Meredith M Regan; Gerrardina Bueti; Jeffrey Tang; Mark A Rubin; Michael Kearney; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.