PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FNP) is a frequent complication of cancer care and evaluation often fails to identify a cause. [(18) F]FDG PET/CT has the potential to identify inflammatory and infectious foci, but its potential role as an investigation for persistent FNP has not previously been explored. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of FDG PET/CT in patients with cancer and severe neutropenia and five or more days of persistent fever despite antibiotic therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of an underlying malignancy and persistent FNP (temperature ≥38°C and neutrophil count <500 cells/μl for 5 days) underwent FDG PET/CT as an adjunct to conventional evaluation and management. RESULTS: The study group comprised 20 patients with FNP who fulfilled the eligibility criteria and underwent FDG PET/CT in addition to conventional evaluation. The median neutrophil count on the day of the FDG PET/CT scan was 30 cells/μl (range 0-730 cells/μl). Conventional evaluation identified 14 distinct sites of infection, 13 (93 %) of which were also identified by FDG PET/CT, including all deep tissue infections. FDG PET/CT identified 9 additional likely infection sites, 8 of which were subsequently confirmed as "true positives" by further investigations. FDG PET/CT was deemed to be of 'high' clinical impact in 15 of the 20 patients (75 %). CONCLUSION: This study supports the utility of FDG PET/CT scanning in severely neutropenic patients with five or more days of fever. Further evaluation of the contribution of FDG PET/CT in the management of FNP across a range of underlying malignancies is required.
PURPOSE:Febrile neutropenia (FNP) is a frequent complication of cancer care and evaluation often fails to identify a cause. [(18) F]FDG PET/CT has the potential to identify inflammatory and infectious foci, but its potential role as an investigation for persistent FNP has not previously been explored. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of FDG PET/CT in patients with cancer and severe neutropenia and five or more days of persistent fever despite antibiotic therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of an underlying malignancy and persistent FNP (temperature ≥38°C and neutrophil count <500 cells/μl for 5 days) underwent FDG PET/CT as an adjunct to conventional evaluation and management. RESULTS: The study group comprised 20 patients with FNP who fulfilled the eligibility criteria and underwent FDG PET/CT in addition to conventional evaluation. The median neutrophil count on the day of the FDG PET/CT scan was 30 cells/μl (range 0-730 cells/μl). Conventional evaluation identified 14 distinct sites of infection, 13 (93 %) of which were also identified by FDG PET/CT, including all deep tissue infections. FDG PET/CT identified 9 additional likely infection sites, 8 of which were subsequently confirmed as "true positives" by further investigations. FDG PET/CT was deemed to be of 'high' clinical impact in 15 of the 20 patients (75 %). CONCLUSION: This study supports the utility of FDG PET/CT scanning in severely neutropenicpatients with five or more days of fever. Further evaluation of the contribution of FDG PET/CT in the management of FNP across a range of underlying malignancies is required.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: M Ruhnke; A Böhme; D Buchheidt; O Cornely; K Donhuijsen; H Einsele; R Enzensberger; H Hebart; C P Heussel; M Horger; H Hof; M Karthaus; W Krüger; G Maschmeyer; O Penack; J Ritter; S Schwartz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A P Douglas; K A Thursky; L J Worth; E Drummond; A Hogg; R J Hicks; M A Slavin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Raghava Kashyap; Eddie Lau; Anupkumar George; John F Seymour; Stephen Lade; Rodney J Hicks; Michael S Hofman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gijsbert J Blokhuis; Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers; Marije G Diender; Wim J G Oyen; Jos M Th Draaisma; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: W J Heinz; D Buchheidt; M Christopeit; M von Lilienfeld-Toal; O A Cornely; H Einsele; M Karthaus; H Link; R Mahlberg; S Neumann; H Ostermann; O Penack; M Ruhnke; M Sandherr; X Schiel; J J Vehreschild; F Weissinger; G Maschmeyer Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Gabrielle M Haeusler; Monica A Slavin; John F Seymour; Senthil Lingaratnam; Benjamin W Teh; Constantine S Tam; Karin A Thursky; Leon J Worth Journal: Eur J Haematol Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 2.997