Literature DB >> 23653244

High FDG activity in focal fat necrosis: a pitfall in interpretation of posttreatment PET/CT in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Raghava Kashyap1, Eddie Lau, Anupkumar George, John F Seymour, Stephen Lade, Rodney J Hicks, Michael S Hofman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: PET/CT has a major role in lymphoma imaging, but glycolytic activity in inflammatory processes can reduce specificity. In this study we evaluated restaging PET/CT findings in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and fat necrosis.
METHODS: We identified 16 patients from 8,819 restaging FDG PET/CT scans with suspicion of or biopsy-proven fat necrosis on PET/CT.
RESULTS: All patients had NHL and demonstrated focal FDG-avid nodular change on CT with density higher than that of fat but lower than that of soft tissue. Histological confirmation was obtained in eight patients, with high GLUT-1 staining between necrotic tissue and organizing fat necrosis evident. Uptake resolved in four patients, and surveillance was continuing in four without relapse.
CONCLUSION: Although rare, identification of fat necrosis in patients with a solitary FDG-avid nodule after therapy is important and may lead to the avoidance of unnecessary interventions or treatment. Specific features on CT aid identification, whilst follow-up imaging can be helpful as the metabolic abnormality regresses with time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653244     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2429-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  19 in total

1.  Observer variation in interpreting 18F-FDG PET/CT findings for lymphoma staging.

Authors:  Michael S Hofman; Nigel C Smeeton; Sheila C Rankin; Tom Nunan; Michael J O'Doherty
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Multidetector-row computed tomography findings of sclerosing mesenteritis with associated diseases and its prevalence.

Authors:  Murat Canyigit; Ali Koksal; Ayca Akgoz; Taylan Kara; Murat Sarisahin; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Report on the Third International Workshop on Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Lymphoma held in Menton, France, 26-27 September 2011 and Menton 2011 consensus.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Emmanuel Itti; Sally Barrington; Corinne Haioun; Aaron Polliack
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-04-23

Review 4.  Impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphoma.

Authors:  Shingo Baba; Koichiro Abe; Takuro Isoda; Yasuhiro Maruoka; Masayuki Sasaki; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 5.  Initial staging of lymphoma with positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks; Michael P Mac Manus; John F Seymour
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  CT-diagnosed mesenteric alterations in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Markus Joerger; Dominique F Nuessli; Samuel Henz; Wolfgang Zaunbauer; Thomas Cerny; Sergio B Cogliatti; Silke Gillessen
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2008-09-23

7.  Fat necrosis mimicking B-cell lymphoma: a PET/CT and FDG study.

Authors:  Abdelfatihe Belakhlef; Chirag Jani; Clifford Church; Ron Fraser; Suresh Lakhanpal
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Early therapeutic response assessment by (18)FDG-positron emission tomography during chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: isolated residual positivity involving bone is not usually a predictor of subsequent treatment failure.

Authors:  Ashley P Ng; Andrew Wirth; John F Seymour; Michael Lee; Annette Hogg; Henry Januszewicz; Max Wolf; H Miles Prince; Michael Macmanus; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2007-03

Review 9.  Imaging of gynecologic malignancies with FDG PET-CT: case examples, physiologic activity, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Anna Maria De Gaetano; Maria Lucia Calcagni; Vittoria Rufini; Anna Lia Valentini; Benedetta Gui; Alessandro Giordano; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-11

Review 10.  Whole body imaging in the abdominal cancer patient: pitfalls of PET-CT.

Authors:  Shaunagh McDermott; Stephen J Skehan
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-01-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Fat necrosis after abdominal surgery: A pitfall in interpretation of FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Tima Davidson; Eyal Lotan; Eyal Klang; Johnatan Nissan; Jeffrey Goldstein; Elinor Goshen; Simona Ben-Haim; Sara Apter; Bar Chikman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The acetabular fossa hot spot on 18F-FDG PET/CT: epidemiology, natural history, and proposed etiology.

Authors:  Shelby L Kubicki; Michael L Richardson; Thomas Martin; Eric Rohren; Wei Wei; Behrang Amini
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Explorative analyses on the value of interim PET for prediction of response in pediatric and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Christian Furth; Ingo G Steffen; Anne S Erdrich; Patrick Hundsdoerfer; Juri Ruf; Günter Henze; Stefan Schönberger; Holger Amthauer; Hubertus Hautzel
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 4.  How We Read Oncologic FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Michael S Hofman; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.