Literature DB >> 22584142

Simplifying clinical risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: the case for the ACEF (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) score.

Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai1, Enrico Romagnoli, Davide Castagno, Imad Sheiban, Stefano De Servi, Corrado Tamburino, Antonio Colombo, Francesco Burzotta, Patrizia Presbitero, Leonardo Bolognese, Leonardo Paloscia, Paolo Rubino, Gennaro Sardella, Carlo Briguori, Luigi Niccoli, Gianfranco Franco, Domenico Di Girolamo, Luigi Piatti, Cesare Greco, A Sonia Petronio, Bruno Loi, Alberto Benassi, Aldo Patti, Achille Gaspardone, Giacomo Frati, Giuseppe Sangiorgi.   

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to appraise the predictive accuracy of a novel and user-friendly risk score, the ACEF (age, creatinine, ejection fraction), in patients undergoing PCI for coronary bifurcations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted enrolling consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation PCI between January 2002 and December 2006 in 22 Italian centres. Patients with complete data to enable computation of the ACEF score were divided into three groups according to tertiles of ACEF score. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. The discrimination of the ACEF score as a continuous variable was also appraised with area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic. A total of 3,535 patients were included: 1,119 in the lowest tertile of ACEF score, 1,190 in the mid tertile, and 1,153 in the highest tertile. Increased ACEF score was associated with significantly different rates of 30-day mortality (0.1% in the lowest tertile vs. 0.5% in the mid tertile and 3.0% in the highest tertile, p<0.001), with similar differences in myocardial infarction (0.3% vs. 0.7% and 1.8%, p<0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, 0.5% vs. 1.2% and 4.3%, p<0.001). After an average follow-up of 24.4±15.1 months, increased ACEF score was still associated with a higher rate of all-cause death (1.3% vs. 2.4% and 11.0%, p<0.001), cardiac death (0.9% vs. 1.4% and 7.2%, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (3.4% vs. 2.7% and 5.7%, p<0.001), MACE (13.6% vs. 15.9% and 22.3%, p<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 1.8% and 5.0%, p<0.001). Discrimination of ACEF score was satisfactory for 30-day mortality (AUC=0.82 [0.77-0.87], p<0.001), 30-day MACE (AUC=0.73 [0.67-0.78], p<0.001), long-term mortality (AUC=0.77 [0.74-0.81], p<0.001), and moderate for long-term MACE (AUC=0.60 [0.57-0.62], p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The simple and extremely user-friendly ACEF score can accurately identify patients undergoing PCI for coronary bifurcation lesions at high risk of early fatal or non-fatal complications, as well as long-term fatality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584142     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  7 in total

1.  To kiss or not to kiss? Impact of final kissing-balloon inflation on early and long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Imad Sheiban; Stefano De Servi; Corrado Tamburino; Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Enrico Romagnoli
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Validation of Scoring Systems That Predict Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Authors:  Wen-Jung Chung; Chung-Yu Chen; Fan-Yen Lee; Chia-Chen Wu; Shu-Kai Hsueh; Cheng-Jei Lin; Chi-Ling Hang; Chiung-Jen Wu; Cheng-I Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  The ACEF (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) score predicts ischemic and bleeding outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated conservatively.

Authors:  Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Wojciech Zasada; Katarzyna Krzanowska; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 1.426

4.  Predictive value of the combination of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score and diabetes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Side Gao; Qingbo Liu; Xiaosong Ding; Hui Chen; Xueqiao Zhao; Hongwei Li
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.717

Review 5.  Fallacies and Possible Remedies of the SYNTAX Score.

Authors:  Yong-Ming He; Li Shen; Jun-Bo Ge
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries.

Authors:  Side Gao; Wenjian Ma; Sizhuang Huang; Xuze Lin; Mengyue Yu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Davide Presutti; Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Antonino G M Marullo; Marzia Lotrionte; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.