Literature DB >> 22583760

Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin study).

Giuseppe Patti1, Vincenzo Pasceri, Luca D'Antonio, Andrea D'Ambrosio, Michele Macrì, Giordano Dicuonzo, Giuseppe Colonna, Antonio Montinaro, Germano Di Sciascio.   

Abstract

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH), with decreased bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin versus UFH in selected PCI patients at high bleeding risk. Four hundred one consecutive patients who underwent PCI fulfilling ≥ 1 enrollment criterion (age >75 years, chronic renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) were randomized to bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg/kg followed by infusion during the procedure; n = 198) or UFH (75 IU/kg; n = 203). In the overall population, 39% were aged >75 years, 22% had renal failure, 63% had diabetes, and 29% had acute coronary syndromes. The primary efficacy end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization). The primary safety end point was the occurrence of any bleeding or entry-site complications after PCI. All patients were preloaded with clopidogrel 600 mg. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used at the operators' discretion. Thirty-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 11.1% in the bivalirudin group and 8.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.56); the primary efficacy end point was reached mainly because of periprocedural myocardial infarction; 1 patient in the bivalirudin group had stent thrombosis. Occurrence of the primary safety end point was 1.5% in the bivalirudin group and 9.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.0001); this benefit was essentially driven by the prevention of entry-site hematomas >10 cm (0.5% vs 6.9%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin (ARMYDA-7 BIVALVE) indicates that bivalirudin, compared with UFH, causes significantly lower bleeding and has a similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with older age, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure who undergo PCI.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22583760     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Thomas G Nührenberg; Willibald Hochholzer; Kambis Mashayekhi; Miroslaw Ferenc; Franz-Josef Neumann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Current periprocedural anticoagulation in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: could bivalirudin be an option? Rationale and design of the BRAVO 2/3 studies.

Authors:  Ziad Sergie; Thierry Lefèvre; Eric Van Belle; Socrates Kakoulides; Usman Baber; Efthymios N Deliargyris; Roxana Mehran; Eberhard Grube; Jochen Reinöhl; George D Dangas
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  The impact of unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin on patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Fabio V Lima; Luis Gruberg; Usman Aslam; Melissa Ramgadoo; Kydanis Clase; Alessandra Trevisan; Allen Jeremias
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials of Bivalirudin versus Heparin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Methodology.

Authors:  Behnood Bikdeli; Thomas McAndrew; Aaron Crowley; Shmuel Chen; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Björn Redfors; Yangbo Liu; Zixuan Zhang; Mengdan Liu; Yiran Zhang; Dominic P Francese; David Erlinge; Stefan K James; Yaling Han; Yi Li; Adnan Kastrati; Stefanie Schüpke; Rod H Stables; Adeel Shahzad; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Patrick Goldstein; Enrico Frigoli; Roxana Mehran; Marco Valgimigli; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Bivalirudin versus heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials stratified by adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa strategy.

Authors:  Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan; Dixitha Anugula; Nagarjuna R Gujjula; Yogesh N V Reddy; Janani Baskaran; Manu Kaushik; Venkata M Alla; Ganesh Raveendran
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Manoj P Jadhav; Tianyao Huo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing PCI: State of Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  G Galasso; M Mirra; G De Luca; F Piscione
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2016-05-16

Review 8.  Adjunctive therapies to reduce thrombotic events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction: role of vorapaxar.

Authors:  Mohamed Farag; Hiten Patel; Diana A Gorog
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin: a meta-analysis of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Mohamed Farag; Diana A Gorog; Abhiram Prasad; Manivannan Srinivasan
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 10.  Bivalirudin Anticoagulant Therapy With or Without Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Transcatheter Coronary Interventional Procedures: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiabei Li; Shiyong Yu; Dehui Qian; Yun He; Jun Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.