| Literature DB >> 23553245 |
Ziad Sergie1, Thierry Lefèvre, Eric Van Belle, Socrates Kakoulides, Usman Baber, Efthymios N Deliargyris, Roxana Mehran, Eberhard Grube, Jochen Reinöhl, George D Dangas.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is considered an important option in the management of patients with critical aortic valve stenosis that are either inoperable or have a high surgical risk. Despite continued advances in the procedural aspects of TAVR and decreasing complications rates, the risks of major vascular complications and stroke remain significant, which may in turn confer worse clinical outcomes and impact morbidity and mortality. In this review, we outline certain limitations of the currently recommended periprocedural anticoagulation in TAVR, namely unfractionated heparin that is guided by activated clotting times and protamine use if the bleeding risk is high. We will explore the potential for bivalirudin in this setting, which has become a frontrunner in acute coronary syndrome management because of favorable pharmacokinetics and lower bleeding complications. Finally, we will describe an ongoing large multicenter multinational trial that compares intravenous bivalirudin to unfractionated heparin during TAVR procedures using standardized clinical endpoints.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23553245 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-0890-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis ISSN: 0929-5305 Impact factor: 2.300