Literature DB >> 22583135

Diagnostic evaluation of patients with nonimmediate cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media.

M J Torres1, F Gomez, I Doña, A Rosado, C Mayorga, I Garcia, N Blanca-Lopez, G Canto, M Blanca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (CM) are common. Allergological evaluation is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and to find a tolerated alternative. The aim of this study was to establish the role of skin testing and the drug provocation test (DPT) in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to CM.
METHODS: Skin intradermal testing and patch testing with delayed readings were carried out with different CM (iobitridol, iomeprol, iodixanol, iohexol, ioversol, iopramide and ioxaglate). Single-blind placebo-controlled DPT was carried out in those cases with a negative skin test. In seven cases, a skin biopsy was obtained from positive skin tests and positive DPT.
RESULTS: Of the 161 subjects evaluated, 34 (21.1%) were skin-test positive, 21 (50%) to Iomeprol, 7 (16.7%) to Iodixanol, 5 (11.9%) to Iobitridol, 4 (9.5%) to Ioxaglate, 3 (7.1%) to Iohexol and 1 (2.4%) to Iopramide. DPT was positive in 44 cases (34.6%) that were skin-test negative, 38 (76%) to Iodixanol, 8 (16%) to Iomeprol and 4 (8%) to Iohexol. Of 78 cases (48.4%) with confirmed hypersensitivity, 34 (43.6%) were identified by skin testing and 44 (56.4%) by DPT. Skin biopsies showed a perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate, mainly in the dermis, with higher levels of CD4 than CD8 T lymphocytes, with expression of activation markers and skin homing receptors.
CONCLUSION: Patients with nonimmediate reactions to CM were identified by skin testing in 43.6% and by DPT in 56.4%. The method to confirm the diagnosis differed depending on the CM involved.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22583135     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02840.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  17 in total

1.  Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.

Authors:  Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.084

2.  Cross-reactivity among iodinated contrast agents: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Adrian A Schmid; John N Morelli; Martin N Hungerbühler; Ingrid B Boehm
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media.

Authors:  Hye-Ryun Kang; Jiung Jeong; Knut Brockow
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Contrast Medium Hypersensitivity: A Large Italian Study with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Eleonora Nucera; Giuseppe Parrinello; Sebastiano Gangemi; Alessandro Buonomo; Arianna Aruanno; Franziska Michaela Lohmeyer; Riccardo Inchingolo; Angela Rizzi
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Delabeling Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: How Far Can You Safely Go?

Authors:  Rannakoe J Lehloenya; Jonny G Peter; Ana Copascu; Jason A Trubiano; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-10

6.  The potential utility of iodinated contrast media (ICM) skin testing in patients with ICM hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Young-Hwan Ahn; Young-Il Koh; Joo-Hee Kim; Ga-Young Ban; Yeon-Kyung Lee; Ga-Na Hong; U-Ram Jin; Byung-Joo Choi; Yoo-Seob Shin; Hae-Sim Park; Young-Min Ye
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Ozge Soyer; Umit Murat Sahiner; Bulent Enis Sekerel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review.

Authors:  Rakesh D Bansie; A Faiz Karim; Maurits S van Maaren; Maud Aw Hermans; Paul LA van Daele; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Saskia M Rombach
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

9.  Drug provocation tests: up-date and novel approaches.

Authors:  Anca Mirela Chiriac; Pascal Demoly
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.406

10.  The involvement of osmolarity in the safety of contrast media.

Authors:  Stefania Isola; Fabiana Furci; Sebastiano Gangemi
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.