Literature DB >> 22581787

MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores.

Rajakumar Nagarajan1, Daniel Margolis, Steven Raman, Manoj K Sarma, Ke Sheng, Christopher R King, Gaurav Verma, James Sayre, Robert E Reiter, M Albert Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate functional changes in prostate cancer patients with three pathologically proven different Gleason scores (GS) (3+3, 3+4, and 4+3) using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study MRSI and DWI data were acquired in 41 prostate cancer patients using a 1.5T MRI scanner with a body matrix combined with an endorectal coil. The metabolite ratios of (Cho+Cr)/Cit were calculated from the peak integrals of total choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and citrate (Cit) in MRSI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were derived from DWI for three groups of Gleason scores. The sensitivity and specificity of MRSI and DWI in patients were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of (Cho+Cr)/Cit ratios of GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3 were: 0.44 ± 0.02, 0.56 ± 0.06, and 0.88 ± 0.11, respectively. For the DWI, the mean and standard deviation of ADC values in GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3 were: 1.13 ± 0.11, 0.97 ± 0.10, and 0.83 ± 0.08 mm(2) /sec, respectively. Statistical significances were observed between the GS and metabolite ratio as well as ADC values and GS.
CONCLUSION: Combined MRSI and DWI helps identify the presence and the proportion of aggressive cancer (ie, Gleason grade 4) that might not be apparent on biopsy sampling. This information can guide subsequent rebiopsy management, especially for active surveillance programs.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581787     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomic imaging of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eva-Margarete Spur; Emily A Decelle; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Utility of Restriction Spectrum Imaging Among Men Undergoing First-Time Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Steven S Raman; Sepideh Shakeri; Sohrab A Mirak; Amirhossein M Bajgiran; Lorna Kwan; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Fuad F ElKhoury; Daniel J A Margolis; David Karow; David S K Lu; Nate White; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason scores.

Authors:  Yukihisa Takayama; Akihiro Nishie; Masaaki Sugimoto; Osamu Togao; Yoshiki Asayama; Kousei Ishigami; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Daisuke Okamoto; Nobuhiro Fujita; Akira Yokomizo; Jochen Keupp; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Robert R Flavell; Antonio C Westphalen; Carmin Liang; Christopher C Sotto; Susan M Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; Zhen J Wang; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10

6.  Controversies on individualized prostate cancer care: gaps in current practice.

Authors:  Steven Joniau; David Pfister; Alexandre de la Taille; Franco Gaboardi; Alan Thompson; Maria J Ribal
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10

7.  Feasibility of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cancer distribution: histopathological correlation with prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Kosuke Kitamura; Satoru Muto; Isao Yokota; Kazutane Hoshimoto; Tatsuro Kaminaga; Takahiro Noguchi; Syou-Ichiro Sugiura; Hisamitsu Ide; Raizo Yamaguchi; Shigeru Furui; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-12-30

8.  MR Spectroscopy in Prostate Cancer: New Algorithms to Optimize Metabolite Quantification.

Authors:  Giovanni Bellomo; Francesco Marcocci; David Bianchini; Emilio Mezzenga; Vincenzo D'Errico; Enrico Menghi; Romano Zannoli; Anna Sarnelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High b value (2,000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1,000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Naoki Kanomata; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Yoshiyuki Miyaji; Hiroki Higashi; Akira Yamamoto; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting prostate tumour in men at increased genetic risk.

Authors:  Nandita M deSouza; Veronica A Morgan; Elizabeth Bancroft; S Aslam Sohaib; Sharon L Giles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Elena Castro; Steven Hazell; Maysam Jafar; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.