Literature DB >> 22581643

Scoring protein interaction decoys using exposed residues (SPIDER): a novel multibody interaction scoring function based on frequent geometric patterns of interfacial residues.

Raed Khashan1, Weifan Zheng, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the structure of protein-protein complexes in computational docking experiments remains a formidable challenge. It has been recognized that identifying native or native-like poses among multiple decoys is the major bottleneck of the current scoring functions used in docking. We have developed a novel multibody pose-scoring function that has no theoretical limit on the number of residues contributing to the individual interaction terms. We use a coarse-grain representation of a protein-protein complex where each residue is represented by its side chain centroid. We apply a computational geometry approach called Almost-Delaunay tessellation that transforms protein-protein complexes into a residue contact network, or an undirectional graph where vertex-residues are nodes connected by edges. This treatment forms a family of interfacial graphs representing a dataset of protein-protein complexes. We then employ frequent subgraph mining approach to identify common interfacial residue patterns that appear in at least a subset of native protein-protein interfaces. The geometrical parameters and frequency of occurrence of each "native" pattern in the training set are used to develop the new SPIDER scoring function. SPIDER was validated using standard "ZDOCK" benchmark dataset that was not used in the development of SPIDER. We demonstrate that SPIDER scoring function ranks native and native-like poses above geometrical decoys and that it exceeds in performance a popular ZRANK scoring function. SPIDER was ranked among the top scoring functions in a recent round of CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions) blind test of protein-protein docking methods.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581643      PMCID: PMC3409293          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  38 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  F Glaser; D M Steinberg; I A Vakser; N Ben-Tal
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-05-01

3.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations.

Authors:  D W Ritchie; G J Kemp
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-05-01

4.  Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association.

Authors:  C Czaplewski; S Rodziewicz-Motowidło; A Liwo; D R Ripoll; R J Wawak; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Anti-cooperativity and cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: Three-body free energy landscapes and comparison with implicit-solvent potential functions for proteins.

Authors:  Seishi Shimizu; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-07-01

6.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.

Authors:  G Moont; H A Gabb; M J Sternberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-15

7.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Long Lu; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions.

Authors:  Joël Janin; Kim Henrick; John Moult; Lynn Ten Eyck; Michael J E Sternberg; Sandor Vajda; Ilya Vakser; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-07-01

9.  Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations.

Authors:  Bala Krishnamoorthy; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination.

Authors:  A Godzik; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of a Substrate-selective Exosite within the Metalloproteinase Anthrax Lethal Factor.

Authors:  Allison B Goldberg; Eunice Cho; Chad J Miller; Hua Jane Lou; Benjamin E Turk
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Modeling Protein Complexes and Molecular Assemblies Using Computational Methods.

Authors:  Romain Launay; Elin Teppa; Jérémy Esque; Isabelle André
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

3.  NPPD: A Protein-Protein Docking Scoring Function Based on Dyadic Differences in Networks of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Amino Acid Residues.

Authors:  Edward S C Shih; Ming-Jing Hwang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-24

4.  The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions.

Authors:  Iain H Moal; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Paul A Bates; Juan Fernández-Recio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Scoring docking conformations using predicted protein interfaces.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Esmaielbeiki; Jean-Christophe Nebel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.

Authors:  Qingzhen Hou; Marc F Lensink; Jaap Heringa; K Anton Feenstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Finding correct protein-protein docking models using ProQDock.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  James D Alsop; Julie C Mitchell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-29

9.  A sparse autoencoder-based deep neural network for protein solvent accessibility and contact number prediction.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Chao Fan; Zhiwen Zeng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures.

Authors:  Surabhi Maheshwari; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2015-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.