Literature DB >> 22581386

Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: a review.

Timo Kuuluvainen1, Olli Tahvonen, Tuomas Aakala.   

Abstract

Since WWII, forest management in Fennoscandia has primarily been based on even-aged stand management, clear cut harvesting and thinning from below. As an alternative, uneven-aged management, based on selection cutting of individual trees or small groups of trees, has been proposed. In this review we discuss the theoretical aspects of ecology and economics of the two management approaches. We also review peer-reviewed studies from boreal Fennoscandia, which have aimed at comparing the outcomes of uneven-aged and the conventional even-aged forest management. According to a common view the main obstacle of practicing uneven-aged forestry is its low economic performance. However, the reviewed studies did not offer any straightforward support for this view and several studies have found uneven-aged management to be fully competitive with existing even-aged management. Studies on the ecological aspects indicated that selection cuttings maintain mature or late-successional forest characteristics and species assemblages better than even-aged management, at least at the stand scale and in the short term. We conclude that although the number of relevant studies has increased in recent years, the ecological and economic performance of alternative management methods still remains poorly examined, especially for those stands with multiple tree species and also at wider spatial and temporal scales. For future research we advocate a strategy that fully takes into consideration the interdisciplinary nature of forest management and is better connected to social goals and latest theoretical and methodological developments in ecology and economics.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581386      PMCID: PMC3472017          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  4 in total

1.  Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach.

Authors:  Lena Gustafsson; Karin Perhans
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management.

Authors:  Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 3.  Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in northern Europe: the complexity challenge.

Authors:  Timo Kuuluvainen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

Authors:  J H Connell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Quantifying the Implications of Different Land Users' Priorities in the Management of Boreal Multiple-Use Forests.

Authors:  Tim Horstkotte; Torgny Lind; Jon Moen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective.

Authors:  Tähti Pohjanmies; María Triviño; Eric Le Tortorec; Adriano Mazziotta; Tord Snäll; Mikko Mönkkönen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in Finland.

Authors:  Joona Lehtomäki; Sakari Tuominen; Tuuli Toivonen; Antti Leinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Forest management optimization across spatial scales to reconcile economic and conservation objectives.

Authors:  Tähti Pohjanmies; Kyle Eyvindson; Mikko Mönkkönen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests.

Authors:  Thomas Asbeck; Francesco Sabatini; Andrey L D Augustynczik; Marco Basile; Jan Helbach; Marlotte Jonker; Anna Knuff; Jürgen Bauhus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessing the resilience of Norway spruce forests through a model-based reanalysis of thinning trials.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Friedrich Vigl; Günter Rössler; Markus Neumann; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Comparison of carbon balances between continuous-cover and clear-cut forestry in Sweden.

Authors:  Tomas Lundmark; Johan Bergh; Annika Nordin; Nils Fahlvik; Bishnu Chandra Poudel
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 8.  Comparing the effects of even- and uneven-aged silviculture on ecological diversity and processes: A review.

Authors:  Philippe Nolet; Daniel Kneeshaw; Christian Messier; Martin Béland
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Forest management strategy affects saproxylic beetle assemblages: A comparison of even and uneven-aged silviculture using direct and indirect sampling.

Authors:  Klara Joelsson; Joakim Hjältén; Heloise Gibb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.