Literature DB >> 18928985

South Carolina Partners for Preterm Birth Prevention: a regional perinatal initiative for the reduction of premature birth in a Medicaid population.

Roger B Newman1, Scott A Sullivan, M Kathryn Menard, Charles S Rittenberg, Amelia K Rowland, Jeffrey E Korte, Heather Kirby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to improve the distribution of preterm deliveries in a Medicaid population through a regional perinatal risk assessment and case management initiative. STUDY
DESIGN: An innovative public/private partnership was initiated in the 8 county Lowcountry (LC) perinatal region to reduce preterm birth (PTB) among Medicaid recipient women. Eligible women were identified and underwent telephonic risk assessment, education, and access to a 24 hours, 7 days per week perinatal hotline. Women with predetermined risk factors for PTB were offered patient-centered case management. Medicaid claims and birth certificate data were used to compare obstetric outcomes for 2006 (intervention) and 2004 (control) in both the Lowcountry (LC; program) and Midlands (ML; nonprogram) perinatal regions.
RESULTS: There were 6356 Medicaid deliveries in the LC in 2006. Of these, 2111 were referred for telephonic risk assessment; 317 had identifiable PTB risk factors and consented to case management. Compared with 2004, there was a significant improvement in the distribution of preterm birth (P = .05) in the LC region, primarily confined to deliveries less than 28 weeks (1.6% vs 1.1%; P = .029, relative risk [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.96). There were also reductions in the frequency (6.7% vs 5.8%; RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .04) and mean duration (25.0 vs 20.6 days; 95% CI, 1.03-7.77; P = .01) of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. No changes were identified in the ML region.
CONCLUSION: A regional initiative of telephonic risk assessment and case management of Medicaid recipient women significantly reduced deliveries less than 28 weeks and NICU care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18928985     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Disparate patterns of prenatal care utilization stratified by medical and psychosocial risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Matthew M Davis; Christie L Palladino
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-05

2.  Risk Prediction for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Medicaid Population.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; James M Greenberg; Elizabeth A Kelly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Care for women with prior preterm birth.

Authors:  Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Does Maternity Care Coordination Influence Perinatal Health Care Utilization? Evidence from North Carolina.

Authors:  Marianne M Hillemeier; Marisa E Domino; Rebecca Wells; Ravi K Goyal; Hye-Chung Kum; Dorothy Cilenti; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Effects of maternity care coordination on pregnancy outcomes: propensity-weighted analyses.

Authors:  Marianne M Hillemeier; Marisa E Domino; Rebecca Wells; Ravi K Goyal; Hye-Chung Kum; Dorothy Cilenti; J Timothy Whitmire; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Proteomic Test for Preterm Birth Prediction.

Authors:  Michael Grabner; Julja Burchard; Chi Nguyen; Haechung Chung; Nilesh Gangan; J Jay Boniface; John A F Zupancic; Eric Stanek
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 8.  A systematic review of person-centered care interventions to improve quality of facility-based delivery.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubashkin; Ruby Warnock; Nadia Diamond-Smith
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.