Literature DB >> 22580419

Isobaric tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics: the ups and downs.

Andy L Christoforou1, Kathryn S Lilley.   

Abstract

Isobaric tagging has proven to be a popular quantitative proteomics tool and has been rapidly adopted to study a wide range of biological questions in the few years since its commercialization. While the flexibility and multiplexing capacity afforded by this technology are clear attractions, it is not without its shortcomings. As the speed and sensitivity of mass spectrometers have improved and the application of isobaric tags to all manner of biological systems has increased, significant issues with quantitative accuracy and precision have come to light. Here we review the issues associated with the use of isobaric tagging methods and discuss the possible solutions which have been proposed to improve their precision and accuracy to approach the levels required within quantitative proteomics.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580419     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6012-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  26 in total

1.  Proteomic analysis of early-stage embryos: implications for egg quality in hapuku (Polyprion oxygeneios).

Authors:  Yair Y Kohn; Jane E Symonds; Torsten Kleffmann; Shinichi Nakagawa; Malgorzata Lagisz; P Mark Lokman
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.794

2.  False-positive rate determination of protein target discovery using a covalent modification- and mass spectrometry-based proteomics platform.

Authors:  Erin C Strickland; M Ariel Geer; Jiyong Hong; Michael C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Monitoring in vivo reversible cysteine oxidation in proteins using ICAT and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sarela García-Santamarina; Susanna Boronat; Alba Domènech; José Ayté; Henrik Molina; Elena Hidalgo
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Redefining the Breast Cancer Exosome Proteome by Tandem Mass Tag Quantitative Proteomics and Multivariate Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  David J Clark; William E Fondrie; Zhongping Liao; Phyllis I Hanson; Amy Fulton; Li Mao; Austin J Yang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Aneuploidy Causes Non-genetic Individuality.

Authors:  Rebecca R Beach; Chiara Ricci-Tam; Christopher M Brennan; Christine A Moomau; Pei-Hsin Hsu; Bo Hua; Rebecca E Silberman; Michael Springer; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Comparison of protein expression ratios observed by sixplex and duplex TMT labeling method.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar; Benbo Gao; Daniel B McClatchy; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Quantitative LC-MS/MS Glycomic Analysis of Biological Samples Using AminoxyTMT.

Authors:  Shiyue Zhou; Yunli Hu; Lucas Veillon; Sergei I Snovida; John C Rogers; Julian Saba; Yehia Mechref
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Quantitative Proteome and Phosphoproteome Analyses of Streptomyces coelicolor Reveal Proteins and Phosphoproteins Modulating Differentiation and Secondary Metabolism.

Authors:  Beatriz Rioseras; Pavel V Shliaha; Vladimir Gorshkov; Paula Yagüe; María T López-García; Nathaly Gonzalez-Quiñonez; Sergey Kovalchuk; Adelina Rogowska-Wrzesinska; Ole N Jensen; Angel Manteca
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  iTRAQ-Based and Label-Free Proteomics Approaches for Studies of Human Adenovirus Infections.

Authors:  Hung V Trinh; Jonas Grossmann; Peter Gehrig; Bernd Roschitzki; Ralph Schlapbach; Urs F Greber; Silvio Hemmi
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2013-03-11

10.  Proteome remodelling during development from blood to insect-form Trypanosoma brucei quantified by SILAC and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kapila Gunasekera; Daniel Wüthrich; Sophie Braga-Lagache; Manfred Heller; Torsten Ochsenreiter
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.