Literature DB >> 22578929

Paradoxical uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatobiliary phase in the evaluation of hepatic metastasis from breast cancer: is the "target sign" a common finding?

Sumin Ha1, Chang Hee Lee, Baek Hui Kim, Yang Shin Park, Jongmee Lee, Jae Woong Choi, Kyeong Ah Kim, Cheol Min Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of breast cancer liver metastasis using gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) with an emphasis on the added value of the hepatobiliary phase (HBP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients with 13 liver metastases were included in the study after the medical records of 29 breast cancer patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI between February 2008 and June 2010 were reviewed. The diagnoses of liver metastasis were established by percutaneous liver biopsy or surgery and on the basis of image findings. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated signal intensity (SI) and sizes of metastases and patterns of enhancement in an HBP. The SI ratio was calculated as the SI of the central hyperintense portion in "target" lesions divided by the SI of nearby normal liver parenchyma on the HBP. We also measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from Diffusion Weighted Image (DWI).
RESULTS: Liver metastases were all hypointense [n=13/13 (100%)] on T1-weighted imaging (WI), and many lesions had a "target" appearance with a central high SI and a peripheral low SI rim (47%) on T2WI. Dynamic study showed rim enhancement on the arterial phase (85%) and a "target" appearance, consisting of a central enhancing portion with peripheral washout or hypointense rim, on the HBP (62%). The mean SI ratio was 0.7. The mean ADC value of "target" appearing metastases was 1.25 (×10(-3) mm(2)/s; range 1.3-1.6) compared with a mean value of 0.8 (×10(-3) mm(2)/s; range 0.8-1.4) in homogeneous defect on the HBP. There was statistically significant difference (P<.05).
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer liver metastases commonly demonstrated as a peripheral ring enhancement on arterial dominant phase and a target sign with a central round enhancing portion and a peripheral hypointense rim on the HBP.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578929     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  8 in total

1.  Specific imaging characteristic of solitary necrotic nodule of the liver: Marked peripheral rim-like enhancement with internal hypointensity on longer delayed MRI.

Authors:  Jiayang Fang; Xiaoyuan Ma; Dexin Yu; Xiangxing Ma; Ying Xiang; Lijuan Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from its various mimickers in liver magnetic resonance imaging: What are the tips when using hepatocyte-specific agents?

Authors:  Yang Shin Park; Chang Hee Lee; Jeong Woo Kim; Sora Shin; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MR imaging of cholangiolocellular carcinoma of the liver: imaging characteristics and histopathological correlations.

Authors:  Hiroki Haradome; Toshiyuki Unno; Hiroyuki Morisaka; Yusuke Toda; Thomas C Kwee; Hiroshi Kondo; Keiji Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Fukuo Kondo; Masahiko Sugitani; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Atypical Enhancement of Gd-BOPTA on the Hepatobiliary Phase in Hepatic Metastasis from Carcinoid Tumor - Case Report.

Authors:  Patryk Pozowski; Paula Misiak; Kinga Szymańska; Rafał Mazur; Małgorzata Sierpowska; Jurand Silicki; Milena Celmer; Mateusz Łasecki; Aleksander Pawluś; Urszula Zaleska-Dorobisz
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-04

Review 5.  Spectrum of liver lesions hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase: an approach by clinical setting.

Authors:  Federica Vernuccio; Domenico Salvatore Gagliano; Roberto Cannella; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; An Tang; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-01-12

6.  Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging.

Authors:  Li-Yong Zhuo; Li-Hong Xing; Xi Ma; Yu Zhang; Ze-Peng Ma; Xiao-Ping Yin; Jia-Ning Wang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Aberrant expression of OATP1B3 in colorectal cancer liver metastases and its clinical implication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Park; Honsoul Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Hogeun Kim; Dong Kyu Choi; Yong Eun Chung; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.