Hiroki Haradome1, Toshiyuki Unno2, Hiroyuki Morisaka3, Yusuke Toda4, Thomas C Kwee5, Hiroshi Kondo6, Keiji Sano7, Tomoaki Ichikawa3, Fukuo Kondo8, Masahiko Sugitani9, Tadatoshi Takayama10. 1. Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Ohyaguchi Kami-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. karate.b@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Showa General Hospital, Koganei, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan. 4. Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Ohyaguchi Kami-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. 5. Department of Radiology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 7. Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 8. Department of Pathology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Department of Pathology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 10. Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the gadoxetic acid disodium (EOB)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) of the liver and compare them with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: EOB-enhanced MR images of 19 patients with CoCC, 23 with ICC, and 51 with HCC were retrospectively evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the characteristic MR features of CoCC with histopathological-imaging correlation. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that dot-/band-shaped internal enhancement during the arterial and portal phases (P < 0.001), and larger arterial ring enhancement ratio (CoCC, 0.13 ± 0.04; ICC, 0.074 ± 0.04; P = 0.013) were significantly independently associated with CoCC in contrast to ICC, whereas several MR features including progressive enhancement during the portal and late phases (P < 0.001), target appearance in the hepatocyte phase (P = 0.004), and vessel penetration (P = 0.013) were significantly more frequently associated with CoCC than HCC. The dot-/band-like internal enhancement (78.9% of CoCCs) histopathologically corresponded to the tumour cell nest with vascular proliferations and retained Glisson's sheath structure. CONCLUSIONS: EOB-enhanced MR features of CoCC largely differ from those of HCC but are similar to those of ICC. However, the finding of thicker arterial ring enhancement with dot-/band-like internal enhancement could help differentiate CoCC from ICC. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR features of cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) resembled those of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR features of CoCC largely differed from those of hepatocellular carcinoma. • Dot-/band-like internal enhancement of CoCC may be helpful for differentiating from ICC. • Arterial ring enhancement of CoCC was larger than that of ICC.
OBJECTIVES: To review the gadoxetic acid disodium (EOB)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) of the liver and compare them with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS:EOB-enhanced MR images of 19 patients with CoCC, 23 with ICC, and 51 with HCC were retrospectively evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the characteristic MR features of CoCC with histopathological-imaging correlation. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that dot-/band-shaped internal enhancement during the arterial and portal phases (P < 0.001), and larger arterial ring enhancement ratio (CoCC, 0.13 ± 0.04; ICC, 0.074 ± 0.04; P = 0.013) were significantly independently associated with CoCC in contrast to ICC, whereas several MR features including progressive enhancement during the portal and late phases (P < 0.001), target appearance in the hepatocyte phase (P = 0.004), and vessel penetration (P = 0.013) were significantly more frequently associated with CoCC than HCC. The dot-/band-like internal enhancement (78.9% of CoCCs) histopathologically corresponded to the tumour cell nest with vascular proliferations and retained Glisson's sheath structure. CONCLUSIONS:EOB-enhanced MR features of CoCC largely differ from those of HCC but are similar to those of ICC. However, the finding of thicker arterial ring enhancement with dot-/band-like internal enhancement could help differentiate CoCC from ICC. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR features of cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) resembled those of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR features of CoCC largely differed from those of hepatocellular carcinoma. • Dot-/band-like internal enhancement of CoCC may be helpful for differentiating from ICC. • Arterial ring enhancement of CoCC was larger than that of ICC.
Authors: Y Fukukura; M Hamanoue; F Fujiyoshi; M Sasaki; K Haruta; H Inoue; T Aiko; M Nakajo Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2000 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Hyeon Tae Jeong; Myeong-Jin Kim; Yong Eun Chung; Jin Young Choi; Young Nyun Park; Ki Whang Kim Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: E Neri; M A Bali; A Ba-Ssalamah; P Boraschi; G Brancatelli; F Caseiro Alves; L Grazioli; T Helmberger; J M Lee; R Manfredi; L Martì-Bonmatì; C Matos; E M Merkle; B Op De Beeck; W Schima; S Skehan; V Vilgrain; C Zech; C Bartolozzi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Elmar M Merkle; Christoph J Zech; Carlo Bartolozzi; Mustafa R Bashir; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Alexander Huppertz; Jeong Min Lee; Jens Ricke; Michiie Sakamoto; Claude B Sirlin; Sheng-Long Ye; Mengsu Zeng Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 5.315