Literature DB >> 22578925

ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Manesh R Patel, Steven R Bailey, Robert O Bonow, Charles E Chambers, Paul S Chan, Gregory J Dehmer, Ajay J Kirtane, L Samuel Wann, R Parker Ward.   

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation, in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where diagnostic catheterization is frequently considered. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of noninvasive imaging appropriate use criteria. The 166 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use (median 7 to 9), uncertain use (median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Diagnostic catheterization may include several different procedure components. The indications developed focused primarily on 2 aspects of diagnostic catheterization. Many indications focused on the performance of coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease with other procedure components (e.g., hemodynamic measurements, ventriculography) at the discretion of the operator. The majority of the remaining indications focused on hemodynamic measurements to evaluate valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and other conditions, with the use of coronary angiography at the discretion of the operator. Seventy-five indications were rated as appropriate, 49 were rated as uncertain, and 42 were rated as inappropriate. The appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578925     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  48 in total

1.  Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; John A Spertus; Kevin F Kennedy; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Paul S Chan; Manesh R Patel; Chris L Bryson; David J Malenka; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Ensuring appropriate use of cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Thomas P Power
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Novel approaches to risk stratification with semi-quantitative scoring systems in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Gary L Murray
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09

5.  Temporal trends in test utilization and prevalence of ischaemia with positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Firas J Al Badarin; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Randall C Thompson; Krishna K Patel; Kevin F Kennedy; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Guiding coronary revascularization using PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging: The proof is in the pudding.

Authors:  Ajay V Srivastava; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Interpreting the interpretations: the use of structured reporting improves referring clinicians' comprehension of coronary CT angiography reports.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Ashley M Lee; Maros Ferencik; Sammy Elmariah; Ronan J P Margey; Oyere Onuma; Marcello Panagia; Suhny Abbara; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  Mechanisms of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Mahek Mirza; Anton Strunets; Win-Kuang Shen; Arshad Jahangir
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  Outcomes of anatomical vs. functional testing for coronary artery disease : Lessons from the PROMISE trial.

Authors:  R Shah; B Foldyna; U Hoffmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.