Literature DB >> 22578417

Opposite modulation of high- and low-level visual aftereffects by perceptual grouping.

Dongjun He1, Daniel Kersten, Fang Fang.   

Abstract

A fundamental task of visual perception is to group visual features - sometimes spatially separated and partially occluded - into coherent, unified representations of objects. Perceptual grouping can vastly simplify the description of a visual scene and is critical for our visual system to understand the three-dimensional visual world. Numerous neurophysiological and brain imaging studies have demonstrated that neural mechanisms of perceptual grouping are characterized by the enhancement of neural responses throughout the visual processing hierarchy, from lower visual areas processing grouped features to higher visual areas representing objects and shapes from grouping. In a series of psychophysical adaptation experiments, we made the counterintuitive observation that perceptual grouping amplified the shape aftereffect but meanwhile, reduced the tilt aftereffect and the threshold elevation aftereffect (TEAE). Furthermore, the modulation of perceptual grouping on the TEAE showed a partial interocular transfer. This finding suggests a 2-fold effect of perceptual grouping - enhancing the high-level shape representation and attenuating the low-level feature representation even at a monocular level. We propose that this effect is a functional manifestation of a predictive coding scheme and reflects an efficient code of visual information across lower and higher visual cortical areas.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578417      PMCID: PMC9374161          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.900


  37 in total

Review 1.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Herbert C Goltz; Anil Kuchinad; Douglas B Tweed; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Interpreting the BOLD signal.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Sheng He
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing.

Authors:  Charles D Gilbert; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Interocular transfer of adaptation in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Christopher M Howarth; Vasily Vorobyov; Frank Sengpiel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones.

Authors:  J A Movshon; P Lennie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

Review 10.  Perceptual grouping and the interactions between visual cortical areas.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Paul Schrater; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Theory of mind: a neural prediction problem.

Authors:  Jorie Koster-Hale; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Grand Research Plan for Neural Circuits of Emotion and Memory--current status of neural circuit studies in China.

Authors:  Yuan-Gui Zhu; He-Qi Cao; Er-Dan Dong
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 3.  Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

4.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Amodal completion instead of predictive coding can explain activity suppression of early visual cortex during illusory shape perception.

Authors:  Chuyao Yan; Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual adaptation selective for individual limbs reveals hierarchical human body representation.

Authors:  Alexander Bratch; Yixiong Chen; Stephen A Engel; Daniel J Kersten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features.

Authors:  Alan Johnston; Ben B Brown; Ryan Elson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Impaired global, and compensatory local, biological motion processing in people with high levels of autistic traits.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-23

9.  Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.