Literature DB >> 22577066

Quantifying physical activity levels of survivors of intensive care: a prospective observational study.

Linda Denehy1, Sue Berney, Laura Whitburn, Lara Edbrooke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promotion of increased physical activity is advocated for survivors of an intensive care unit (ICU) admission to improve physical function and health-related quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were: (1) to measure free-living physical activity levels and (2) to correlate the measurements with scores on a self-reported activity questionnaire. A secondary aim was to explore factors associated with physical activity levels.
DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Nested within a larger randomized controlled trial, participants were block randomized to measure free-living physical activity levels. Included participants wore an accelerometer for 7 days during waking hours at 2 months after ICU discharge. At completion of the 7 days of monitoring, participants were interviewed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire. Factors associated with physical activity were explored using regression analysis.
RESULTS: The ICU survivors (median age=59 years, interquartile range=49-66; mean Acute Physiologic Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE II] score=18, interquartile range=16-21) were inactive when quantitatively measured at 2 months after hospital discharge. Participants spent an average of 90% of the time inactive and only 3% of the time walking. Only 37% of the sample spent 30 minutes or more per day in the locomotion category (more than 20 steps in a row). Activity reported using the PASE questionnaire was lower than that reported in adults who were healthy. The PASE scores correlated only fairly with activity measured by steps per day. The presence of comorbidities explained one third of the variance in physical activity levels. LIMITATIONS: Accelerometer overreading, patient heterogeneity, selection bias, and sample size not reached were limitations of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of an ICU admission greater than 5 days demonstrated high levels of inactivity for prolonged periods at 2 months after ICU discharge, and the majority did not meet international recommendations regarding physical activity. Comorbidity appears to be a promising factor associated with activity levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22577066     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20110411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  8 in total

1.  Unraveling the myriad contributors to persistent diminished exercise capacity after critical illness.

Authors:  Nicola Latronico; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Outcome measures report different aspects of patient function three months following critical care.

Authors:  Linda Denehy; Amy Nordon-Craft; Lara Edbrooke; Daniel Malone; Sue Berney; Margaret Schenkman; Marc Moss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Physical activity, muscle strength, and exercise capacity 3 months after severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Rodrigo Cerqueira Borges; Celso R F Carvalho; Alexandra Siqueira Colombo; Mariucha Pereira da Silva Borges; Francisco Garcia Soriano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Six-Minute Walk Distance After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Selina M Parry; Swaroopa R Nalamalapu; Krishidhar Nunna; Anahita Rabiee; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Dale M Needham; Victor D Dinglas
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.510

5.  Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced in the first year following a critical illness: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia J Ohtake; Jacqueline Coffey Scott; Rana S Hinman; Alan Chong Lee; James M Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A pragmatic, phase III, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, dose increment randomised trial of regular, low-dose extended-release morphine for chronic breathlessness: Breathlessness, Exertion And Morphine Sulfate (BEAMS) study protocol.

Authors:  David Currow; Gareth John Watts; Miriam Johnson; Christine F McDonald; John O Miners; Andrew A Somogyi; Linda Denehy; Nicola McCaffrey; Danny J Eckert; Philip McCloud; Sandra Louw; Lawrence Lam; Aine Greene; Belinda Fazekas; Katherine C Clark; Kwun Fong; Meera R Agar; Rohit Joshi; Sharon Kilbreath; Diana Ferreira; Magnus Ekström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A rehabilitation intervention to promote physical recovery following intensive care: a detailed description of construct development, rationale and content together with proposed taxonomy to capture processes in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pam Ramsay; Lisa G Salisbury; Judith L Merriweather; Guro Huby; Janice E Rattray; Alastair M Hull; Stephen J Brett; Simon J Mackenzie; Gordon D Murray; John F Forbes; Timothy Simon Walsh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arabella Fischer; Matthias Spiegl; Klaus Altmann; Andreas Winkler; Anna Salamon; Michael Themessl-Huber; Mohamed Mouhieddine; Eva Maria Strasser; Arno Schiferer; Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga; Michael Hiesmayr
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.