Literature DB >> 22576463

Toxico-/biokinetics of nanomaterials.

Robert Landsiedel1, Eric Fabian, Lan Ma-Hock, Ben van Ravenzwaay, Wendel Wohlleben, Karin Wiench, Franz Oesch.   

Abstract

Nanomaterials (NM) offer great technological advantages but their risks to human health are still under discussion. For toxicological testing and evaluation, information on the toxicokinetics of NM is essential as it is different from that of most other xenobiotics. This review provides an overview on the toxicokinetics of NM available to date. The toxicokinetics of NM depends on particle size and shape, protein binding, agglomeration, hydrophobicity, surface charge and protein binding. In most studies with topical skin application, unintentional permeation and systemic availability were not observed; permeation for some NM with distinct properties was observed in animals. Upon inhalation, low levels of primary model nanoparticles became systemically available, but many real-world engineered NM aggregate in aerosols, do not disintegrate in the lung, and do not become systemically available. NM are prone to lymphatic transport, and many NM are taken up by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) acting as a depot. Their half-life in blood depends on their uptake by MPS rather than their elimination from the body. NM reaching the GI tract are excreted with the feces, but of some NM low levels are absorbed and become systemically available. Some quantum dots were not observably excreted in urine nor in feces. Some model quantum dots, however, were efficiently excreted by the kidneys below, but not above 5-6 nm hydrodynamic diameter, while nanotubes 20-30 nm thick and 500-2,000 nm long were abundant in urine. NM are typically not metabolized. Some NM cross the blood-brain barrier favored by a negative surface charge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22576463     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0858-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  30 in total

1.  In vitro intestinal toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in rat and human cell models.

Authors:  Taylor E Henson; Jana Navratilova; Alan H Tennant; Karen D Bradham; Kim R Rogers; Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 2.  The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Luca Fontana; Veruscka Leso; Antonio Bergamaschi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive.

Authors:  Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Laurence Castle; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul Fowler; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez; Peter Fürst; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Rainer Gürtler; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Wim Mennes; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Detlef Wölfle; Emanuela Corsini; Francesco Cubadda; Didima De Groot; Rex FitzGerald; Sara Gunnare; Arno Christian Gutleb; Jan Mast; Alicja Mortensen; Agnes Oomen; Aldert Piersma; Veronika Plichta; Beate Ulbrich; Henk Van Loveren; Diane Benford; Margherita Bignami; Claudia Bolognesi; Riccardo Crebelli; Maria Dusinska; Francesca Marcon; Elsa Nielsen; Josef Schlatter; Christiane Vleminckx; Stefania Barmaz; Maria Carfí; Consuelo Civitella; Alessandra Giarola; Ana Maria Rincon; Rositsa Serafimova; Camilla Smeraldi; Jose Tarazona; Alexandra Tard; Matthew Wright
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 4.  The impact of nanomaterial characteristics on inhalation toxicity.

Authors:  Frank S Bierkandt; Lars Leibrock; Sandra Wagener; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Fibrillar vs crystalline nanocellulose pulmonary epithelial cell responses: Cytotoxicity or inflammation?

Authors:  Autumn L Menas; Naveena Yanamala; Mariana T Farcas; Maria Russo; Sherri Friend; Philip M Fournier; Alexander Star; Ivo Iavicoli; Galina V Shurin; Ulla B Vogel; Bengt Fadeel; Donald Beezhold; Elena R Kisin; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 6.  Convergence of nanotechnology and cancer prevention: are we there yet?

Authors:  David G Menter; Sherri L Patterson; Craig D Logsdon; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-07-24

7.  Challenges and opportunities in the advancement of nanomedicines.

Authors:  Alexander Wei; Jonathan G Mehtala; Anil K Patri
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Biokinetics of Nanomaterials: the Role of Biopersistence.

Authors:  Peter Laux; Christian Riebeling; Andy M Booth; Joseph D Brain; Josephine Brunner; Cristina Cerrillo; Otto Creutzenberg; Irina Estrela-Lopis; Thomas Gebel; Gunnar Johanson; Harald Jungnickel; Heiko Kock; Jutta Tentschert; Ahmed Tlili; Andreas Schäffer; Adriënne J A M Sips; Robert A Yokel; Andreas Luch
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  Different biokinetics of nanomedicines linking to their toxicity; an overview.

Authors:  Sara Mostafalou; Hamidreza Mohammadi; Ali Ramazani; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ionic silver and silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Gerald Bachler; Natalie von Goetz; Konrad Hungerbühler
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.