Literature DB >> 22575757

Constructing structural networks of signaling pathways on the proteome scale.

Guray Kuzu1, Ozlem Keskin, Attila Gursoy, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

Proteins function through their interactions, and the availability of protein interaction networks could help in understanding cellular processes. However, the known structural data are limited and the classical network node-and-edge representation, where proteins are nodes and interactions are edges, shows only which proteins interact; not how they interact. Structural networks provide this information. Protein-protein interface structures can also indicate which binding partners can interact simultaneously and which are competitive, and can help forecasting potentially harmful drug side effects. Here, we use a powerful protein-protein interactions prediction tool which is able to carry out accurate predictions on the proteome scale to construct the structural network of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. This knowledge-based method, PRISM, is motif-based, and is combined with flexible refinement and energy scoring. PRISM predicts protein interactions based on structural and evolutionary similarity to known protein interfaces.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22575757     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  33 in total

1.  Structural Modeling of GR Interactions with the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex and C/EBP.

Authors:  Serena Muratcioglu; Diego M Presman; John R Pooley; Lars Grøntved; Gordon L Hager; Ruth Nussinov; Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Integration of structural dynamics and molecular evolution via protein interaction networks: a new era in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Avishek Kumar; Brandon M Butler; Sudhir Kumar; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  Rule-based modeling: a computational approach for studying biomolecular site dynamics in cell signaling systems.

Authors:  Lily A Chylek; Leonard A Harris; Chang-Shung Tung; James R Faeder; Carlos F Lopez; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Protein models docking benchmark 2.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Alexander V Tuzikov; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-03-25

Review 5.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks.

Authors:  Roberto Mosca; Arnaud Céol; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Identification of the β-lactamase inhibitor protein-II (BLIP-II) interface residues essential for binding affinity and specificity for class A β-lactamases.

Authors:  Nicholas G Brown; Dar-Chone Chow; Kevin E Ruprecht; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Modeling protein assemblies in the proteome.

Authors:  Guray Kuzu; Ozlem Keskin; Ruth Nussinov; Attila Gursoy
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Allosteric activation of Bordetella pertussis adenylyl cyclase by calmodulin: molecular dynamics and mutagenesis studies.

Authors:  Edithe Selwa; Marilyne Davi; Alexandre Chenal; Ana-Cristina Sotomayor-Pérez; Daniel Ladant; Thérèse E Malliavin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Structural templates for comparative protein docking.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Alexander V Tuzikov; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.