Literature DB >> 22572078

Positron emission tomography for assessing local failure after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Xu Zhang1, Hui Liu, Peter Balter, Pamela K Allen, Ritsuko Komaki, Tinsu Pan, Hubert H Chuang, Joe Y Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed whether positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography standardized uptake values (SUVs) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could predict local recurrence (LR) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study comprised 128 patients with Stage I (n = 68) or isolated recurrent/secondary parenchymal (n = 60) NSCLC treated with image-guided SBRT to 50 Gy over 4 consecutive days; prior radiotherapy was allowed. PET/computed tomography scans were obtained before therapy and at 1 to 6 months after therapy, as well as subsequently as clinically indicated. Continuous variables were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests and categorical variables with Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Actuarial local failure rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 6-71 months), the actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 100%, 98.5%, and 98.5%, respectively, in the Stage I group and 95.8%, 87.6%, and 85.8%, respectively, in the recurrent group. The cumulative rates of regional nodal recurrence and distant metastasis were 8.8% (6 of 68) and 14.7% (10 of 68), respectively, for the Stage I group and 11.7% (7 of 60) and 16.7% (10 of 60), respectively, for the recurrent group. Univariate analysis showed that SUVs obtained 12.1 to 24 months after treatment for the Stage I group (p = 0.007) and 6.1 to 12 months and 12.1 to 24 months after treatment for the recurrent group were associated with LR (p < 0.001 for both). Of the 128 patients, 17 (13.3%) had ipsilateral consolidation after SBRT but no elevated metabolic activity on PET; none had LR. The cutoff maximum SUV of 5 was found to have 100% sensitivity, 91% specificity, a 50% positive predictive value, and a 100% negative predictive value for predicting LR.
CONCLUSIONS: PET was helpful for distinguishing SBRT-induced consolidation from LR. SUVs obtained more than 6 months after SBRT for NSCLC were associated with local failure. A maximum SUV greater than 5, especially at more than 6 months after SBRT, should prompt biopsy to rule out LR.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22572078      PMCID: PMC3474601          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

1.  Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  P B Bach; L D Cramer; J L Warren; C B Begg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with lung cancer previously treated with thoracic radiation.

Authors:  Patrick Kelly; Peter A Balter; Neal Rebueno; Hadley J Sharp; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: powerful correlation with survival and high impact on treatment.

Authors:  M P Mac Manus; R J Hicks; D L Ball; V Kalff; J P Matthews; E Salminen; P Khaw; A Wirth; D Rischin; A McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert Timmerman; Ronald McGarry; Constantin Yiannoutsos; Lech Papiez; Kathy Tudor; Jill DeLuca; Marvene Ewing; Ramzi Abdulrahman; Colleen DesRosiers; Mark Williams; James Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael P Mac Manus; Rodney J Hicks; Jane P Matthews; Allan McKenzie; Danny Rischin; Eeva K Salminen; David L Ball
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Stereotactic hypofractionated high-dose irradiation for stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: clinical outcomes in 245 subjects in a Japanese multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Onishi; Tsutomu Araki; Hiroki Shirato; Yasushi Nagata; Masahiro Hiraoka; Kotaro Gomi; Takashi Yamashita; Yuzuru Niibe; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Kazushige Hayakawa; Yoshihiro Takai; Tomoki Kimura; Yutaka Hirokawa; Atsuya Takeda; Atsushi Ouchi; Masato Hareyama; Masaki Kokubo; Ryusuke Hara; Jun Itami; Kazunari Yamada
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Ware G Kuschner; Chara E Rydzak; Courtney C Maclean; Anita N Demas; Hidenobu Shigemitsu; Jo Kay Chan; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Radiographic response and clinical toxicity following SBRT for stage I lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Bradley
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ramón Rami-Porta; David Ball; John Crowley; Dorothy J Giroux; James Jett; William D Travis; Masahiro Tsuboi; Eric Vallières; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  New techniques for assessing response after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Mattonen; Kitty Huang; Aaron D Ward; Suresh Senan; David A Palma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Pulmonary imaging after stereotactic radiotherapy-does RECIST still apply?

Authors:  Sarah A Mattonen; Aaron D Ward; David A Palma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Response evaluation after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for localised non-small-cell lung cancer: an equipoise of available resource and accuracy.

Authors:  Andre G Gouveia; Osbert C Zalay; Kevin Lm Chua; Fabio Ynoe Moraes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Impact of maximum standardized uptake value of non-small cell lung cancer on detecting lymph node involvement in potential stereotactic body radiotherapy candidates.

Authors:  Shanyuan Zhang; Shaolei Li; Yuquan Pei; Miao Huang; Fangliang Lu; Qingfeng Zheng; Nan Li; Yue Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: a potentially curable approach to early stage multiple primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Joe Y Chang; Yung-Hsien Liu; Zhengfei Zhu; James W Welsh; Daniel R Gomez; Ritsuko Komaki; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Can high-risk CT features suggest local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Darragh F Halpenny; Yeon Joo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Chong Hyun Suh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Surveillance Practice Patterns after Curative Intent Therapy for Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Christopher T Erb; Kevin W Su; Pamela R Soulos; Lynn T Tanoue; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Illustrative cases of false positive biopsies after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer based on abnormal FDG-PET-CT imaging.

Authors:  Mamta Singhvi; Percy Lee
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-22

9.  Positron-emission tomography CT to identify local recurrence in stage I lung cancer patients 1 year after stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Essler; J Wantke; B Mayer; K Scheidhauer; R A Bundschuh; B Haller; S T Astner; M Molls; N Andratschke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Does early posttreatment surveillance imaging affect subsequent management following stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Megan E Daly; Laurel A Beckett; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.