| Literature DB >> 22572029 |
J M A Ashbourn1, J J Miller, V Reumers, V Baekelandt, L Geris.
Abstract
Neurogenesis has been the subject of active research in recent years and many authors have explored the phenomenology of the process, its regulation and its purported purpose. Recent developments in bioluminescent imaging (BLI) allow direct in vivo imaging of neurogenesis, and in order to interpret the experimental results, mathematical models are necessary. This study proposes such a mathematical model that describes adult mammalian neurogenesis occurring in the subventricular zone and the subsequent migration of cells through the rostral migratory stream to the olfactory bulb (OB). This model assumes that a single chemoattractant is responsible for cell migration, secreted both by the OB and in an endocrine fashion by the cells involved in neurogenesis. The solutions to the system of partial differential equations are compared with the physiological rodent process, as previously documented in the literature and quantified through the use of BLI, and a parameter space is described, the corresponding solution to which matches that of the rodent model. A sensitivity analysis shows that this parameter space is stable to perturbation and furthermore that the system as a whole is sloppy. A large number of parameter sets are stochastically generated, and it is found that parameter spaces corresponding to physiologically plausible solutions generally obey constraints similar to the conditions reported in vivo. This further corroborates the model and its underlying assumptions based on the current understanding of the investigated phenomenon. Concomitantly, this leaves room for further quantitative predictions pertinent to the design of future proposed experiments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22572029 PMCID: PMC3427514 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J R Soc Interface ISSN: 1742-5662 Impact factor: 4.118
Figure 1.(a) Illustration of the approximate physiological location of the migratory process. (b) Location of the computational domain with inset a typical BLI. (c) The three interconnected boxes that form the computational domain; the initial concentrations of the chemoattractant factor fA and nB cell density are shown in grey within the olfactory bulb (OB) and subventricular zone (SVZ), respectively. The central black box indicates the region considered to be the centre of the OB, where in this simplifying model all type-A neuroblasts which arrive either undergo apoptosis or specify into adult neurons. RMS, rostral migratory stream. Scale bar shows unit length in the model, corresponding to 1.4 mm if dimensionalized.
Figure 2.A schematic overview of the model and its terms, illustrating the linear differentiation cascade of the neuroblasts and associated terms. γ and ε are apoptosis rates; β are proliferation rates; α and ζ are differentiation rates; δ are diffusion constants; f and g are chemoattractants.
Figure 3.(a,b) The emergence of mature neurons in the system and the time evolution of the chemotactic factor fA for the set of parameter values βB = 7.567, βC = 9.441, βA = 1.735, βA = 0.785, αC = 2.182, αA = 1.700, γB = 0.701, γC = 0.774, γA = 0.737, γ = 0.079, δA = 0.037, δ = 0.053, δ = 1.955, ηA = 0.134, η = 9.136, κA = 6.045, κB = 1.276, κC = 2.292, κD = 9.284, λ = 0.422, a1 = 1.000, a2 = 0.500, a4 = 1.000, a5 = 0.461, b = 0.500, d = 1.921, μ = 0.213. Initial conditions were nC, nA, n = 0; nB and fA initially obeyed a Gaussian distribution: fA in the OB with a maximum magnitude of unity and a standard deviation of half of the OB's side; n in the SVZ with a maximum magnitude of 100 and standard deviation of 5/6 × half of the side of the SVZ. (c)(i) A comparison between the OB cell density of the model (nA + nN) and (ii) recorded in vivo bioluminescent photon fluxes of the OB reported in [8]. (p s−1); photons per second.
Figure 4.A direct comparison between the most and least neurogenic (a and b, respectively) solutions obtained through a ±10% perturbation to the parameter space illustrated in figure 3. While the cell density in the OB varies greatly in magnitude between the two spaces (upper and lower bounds on the shaded region in (c); unperturbed solution in black), the overall behaviour changes very little.
Figure 5.(a) Illustrative contours of constant model deviation as quantified by ζ2 (generalized parameter-space least-squares metric quantifying how solutions change throughout parameter space relative to one particular set of parameter coordinates); slices are through the βB–βC plane (logistic growth constants for B- and C-type cells) with all other values being the same as those in figure 3. Contour values are labelled; the centre of the figure corresponds to a minimum. (b) The normalized absolute values of the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix in the same parameter space location. These eigenvalues span nearly 10 orders of magnitude; a characteristic of sloppy systems [32].