Literature DB >> 22571871

Monte Carlo role in radiobiological modelling of radiotherapy outcomes.

Issam El Naqa1, Piotr Pater, Jan Seuntjens.   

Abstract

Radiobiological models are essential components of modern radiotherapy. They are increasingly applied to optimize and evaluate the quality of different treatment planning modalities. They are frequently used in designing new radiotherapy clinical trials by estimating the expected therapeutic ratio of new protocols. In radiobiology, the therapeutic ratio is estimated from the expected gain in tumour control probability (TCP) to the risk of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). However, estimates of TCP/NTCP are currently based on the deterministic and simplistic linear-quadratic formalism with limited prediction power when applied prospectively. Given the complex and stochastic nature of the physical, chemical and biological interactions associated with spatial and temporal radiation induced effects in living tissues, it is conjectured that methods based on Monte Carlo (MC) analysis may provide better estimates of TCP/NTCP for radiotherapy treatment planning and trial design. Indeed, over the past few decades, methods based on MC have demonstrated superior performance for accurate simulation of radiation transport, tumour growth and particle track structures; however, successful application of modelling radiobiological response and outcomes in radiotherapy is still hampered with several challenges. In this review, we provide an overview of some of the main techniques used in radiobiological modelling for radiotherapy, with focus on the MC role as a promising computational vehicle. We highlight the current challenges, issues and future potentials of the MC approach towards a comprehensive systems-based framework in radiobiological modelling for radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571871     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/R75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale radiation transport and clinical beam modeling for gold nanoparticle dose enhanced radiotherapy (GNPT) using X-rays.

Authors:  Piotr Zygmanski; Erno Sajo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Objective assessment of image quality VI: imaging in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Matthew A Kupinski; Stefan Müeller; Howard J Halpern; John C Morris; Roisin Dwyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Treatment planning evaluation and optimization should be biologically and not dose/volume based.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Charles S Mayo; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The effect of energy spectrum change on DNA damage in and out of field in 10-MV clinical photon beams.

Authors:  A O Ezzati; Y Xiao; M Sohrabpour; M T Studenski
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Extension of TOPAS for the simulation of proton radiation effects considering molecular and cellular endpoints.

Authors:  Lisa Polster; Jan Schuemann; Ilaria Rinaldi; Lucas Burigo; Aimee L McNamara; Robert D Stewart; Andrea Attili; David J Carlson; Tatsuhiko Sato; José Ramos Méndez; Bruce Faddegon; Joseph Perl; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Monte Carlo simulations will change the way we treat patients with proton beams today.

Authors:  H Paganetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Radiogenomics and radiotherapy response modeling.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Sarah L Kerns; James Coates; Yi Luo; Corey Speers; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Track structure model of microscopic energy deposition by protons and heavy ions in segments of neuronal cell dendrites represented by cylinders or spheres.

Authors:  Murat Alp; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2017-04-02

9.  The Influence of DNA Configuration on the Direct Strand Break Yield.

Authors:  M A Bernal; C E deAlmeida; S Incerti; C Champion; V Ivanchenko; Z Francis
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Simulating the Impact of the Natural Radiation Background on Bacterial Systems: Implications for Very Low Radiation Biological Experiments.

Authors:  Nathanael Lampe; David G Biron; Jeremy M C Brown; Sébastien Incerti; Pierre Marin; Lydia Maigne; David Sarramia; Hervé Seznec; Vincent Breton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.