Literature DB >> 22571868

A one-day centralized work-up for kidney transplant recipient candidates: a quality improvement report.

Richard N Formica1, Fidel Barrantes, William S Asch, Margaret J Bia, Steven Coca, Robert Kalyesubula, Barbara McCloskey, Tucker Leary, Antonios Arvelakis, Sanjay Kulkarni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Waiting time for a kidney transplant is calculated from the date the patient is placed on the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) waitlist to the date the patient undergoes transplant. Time from transplant evaluation to listing represents unaccounted waiting time, potentially resulting in longer dialysis exposure for some patients with prolonged evaluation times. There are established disparities demonstrating that groups of patients take longer to be placed on the waitlist and thus have less access to kidney transplant. STUDY
DESIGN: Quality improvement report. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 905 patients from a university-based hospital were evaluated for kidney transplant candidacy, and analysis was performed from July 1, 2004, to January 31, 2010. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN: A 1-day centralized work-up was implemented on July 1, 2007, whereby the transplant center coordinated the necessary tests needed to fulfill minimal listing criteria. OUTCOME: Time from evaluation to UNOS listing was compared between the 2 cohorts. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were created to assess the relative hazards of waitlist placement comparing 1-day versus conventional work-up and were adjusted for age, sex, race, and education.
RESULTS: Of 905 patients analyzed, 378 underwent conventional evaluation and 527 underwent a 1-day center-coordinated evaluation. Median time to listing in the 1-day center-coordinated evaluation compared with conventional was significantly less (46 vs 226 days, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, and education level, the 1-day in-center group was 3 times more likely to place patients on the wait list (adjusted HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.64-3.59). Listing time was significantly decreased across race, sex, education, and ethnicity. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective. Variables that may influence transplant practitioners, such as comorbid conditions or functional status, were not assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: A 1-day center-coordinated pretransplant work-up model significantly decreased time to listing for kidney transplant.
Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571868     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  11 in total

1.  Protocol of the KTFT-TALK study to reduce racial disparities in kidney transplant evaluation and living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kellee Bornemann; Emilee Croswell; Menna Abaye; Cindy L Bryce; Chung-Chou H Chang; Deborah S Good; Cathleen A Freehling Heiles; Mary Amanda Dew; L Ebony Boulware; Amit D Tevar; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Asking dialysis patients about what they were told: a new strategy for improving access to kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Mark Unruh; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  An overview of disparities and interventions in pediatric kidney transplantation worldwide.

Authors:  Michael A Freeman; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Impact of Navigators on First Visit to a Transplant Center, Waitlisting, and Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Catherine M Sullivan; Kitty V Barnswell; Kate Greenway; Cindy M Kamps; Derrick Wilson; Jeffrey M Albert; Jacqueline Dolata; Anne Huml; Julie A Pencak; John T Ducker; Roberto Gedaly; Christopher M Jones; Todd Pesavento; Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Quality Metrics in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kendra E Brett; Lindsay J Ritchie; Emily Ertel; Alexandria Bennett; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Disparities, race/ethnicity and access to pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sandra Amaral; Rachel Patzer
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Your Path to Transplant: A randomized controlled trial of a tailored expert system intervention to increase knowledge, attitudes, and pursuit of kidney transplant.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Yujie Cui; Jennifer L Beaumont; Andrea Paiva; Amanda F Lipsey; Crystal S Anderson; Mark L Robbins
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants' perspective.

Authors:  Peter Gan Kim Soon; Soo Kun Lim; Sanjay Rampal; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clinicians' perspectives on equity of access to dialysis and kidney transplantation for rural people in Australia: a semistructured interview study.

Authors:  Nicole Jane Scholes-Robertson; Talia Gutman; Martin Howell; Jonathan Craig; Rachel Chalmers; Karen M Dwyer; Matthew Jose; Ieyesha Roberts; Allison Tong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center.

Authors:  Beatrice P Concepcion; Rachel C Forbes; Aihua Bian; Heidi M Schaefer
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2016-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.