Literature DB >> 22571502

The oxygen uptake response to incremental ramp exercise: methodogical and physiological issues.

Jan Boone1, Jan Bourgois.   

Abstract

An incremental ramp exercise is a protocol that is frequently used in the domain of exercise testing to get an insight into the exercise tolerance of both healthy active populations (including athletes) and patients, due to the specific characteristics of the protocol. The continuous and linear increase in work rate is not only less strenuous for populations with a very low exercise capacity but it requires the aerobic metabolism to adapt to the continuously changing conditions. Therefore, this protocol can provide important information on the adaptive capacity of individuals to exercise in non-steady-state conditions. The ramp exercise has also been used in the past two decades to get an insight into the underlying mechanisms of the oxygen uptake (·VO₂) response (and kinetics) to exercise. Against the expectations, it has been shown that the parameters that quantify the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise do not completely correspond to those obtained from constant work-rate transitions and incremental step exercise. For that reason, it could be concluded that the ·VO₂ response is specific to ramp exercise, and thus is determined by other mechanisms than those which determine other protocols. Although the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise has a high level of reproducibility and a uniform pattern can be observed, especially for the ·VO₂ response below the gas exchange threshold (GET) [above the GET, the ·VO₂ response is less clear], some prudence is necessary when interpreting potential differences in the ·VO₂ response between populations. Several methodological issues (e.g. baseline work rate, ramp slope) exert an important impact on the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise. The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the methodological and physiological factors that have an impact on the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise. It is of importance that exercise physiologists take these factors into consideration, not only prior to the conductance of the ramp exercise in a variety of subjects, but also when interpreting the obtained results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571502     DOI: 10.2165/11599690-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.928


  72 in total

1.  Reference values for dynamic responses to incremental cycle ergometry in males and females aged 20 to 80.

Authors:  J A Neder; L E Nery; C Peres; B J Whipp
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Influence of peak VO2 and muscle fiber type on the efficiency of moderate exercise.

Authors:  Lindsay A Mallory; Barry W Scheuermann; Brian D Hoelting; Mark L Weiss; Richard M McAllister; Thomas J Barstow
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Gary J Balady; Ross Arena; Kathy Sietsema; Jonathan Myers; Lola Coke; Gerald F Fletcher; Daniel Forman; Barry Franklin; Marco Guazzi; Martha Gulati; Steven J Keteyian; Carl J Lavie; Richard Macko; Donna Mancini; Richard V Milani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Aerobic oxygen consumption and alactic debt in muscular work.

Authors:  F M HENRY
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Oxygen uptake does not increase linearly at high power outputs during incremental exercise test in humans.

Authors:  J A Zoladz; K Duda; J Majerczak
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998-04

6.  Dynamics of pulmonary gas exchange and heart rate changes at start and end of exercise.

Authors:  D Linnarsson
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1974

7.  Effect of endurance training on possible determinants of VO2 during heavy exercise.

Authors:  R Casaburi; T W Storer; I Ben-Dov; K Wasserman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-01

8.  Effect of varying exercise intensity on glycogen depletion in human muscle fibres.

Authors:  N K Vøllestad; P C Blom
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1985-11

9.  Selective glycogen depletion pattern in human muscle fibres after exercise of varying intensity and at varying pedalling rates.

Authors:  P D Gollnick; K Piehl; B Saltin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  CPX/D underestimates VO(2) in athletes compared with an automated Douglas bag system.

Authors:  Christopher J Gore; Robert J Clark; Nicholas J Shipp; Grant E Van Der Ploeg; Robert T Withers
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  17 in total

1.  Influence of muscle metabolic heterogeneity in determining the V̇o2p kinetic response to ramp-incremental exercise.

Authors:  Daniel A Keir; Alan P Benson; Lorenzo K Love; Taylor C Robertson; Harry B Rossiter; John M Kowalchuk
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-12-17

2.  Establishing the V̇o2 versus constant-work-rate relationship from ramp-incremental exercise: simple strategies for an unsolved problem.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Rafael de Almeida Azevedo; Daniel A Keir; Juan M Murias
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-10-03

3.  The plateau in the NIRS-derived [HHb] signal near the end of a ramp incremental test does not indicate the upper limit of O2 extraction in the vastus lateralis.

Authors:  Erin Calaine Inglis; Danilo Iannetta; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Characterizing cerebral and locomotor muscle oxygenation to incremental ramp exercise in healthy children: relationship with pulmonary gas exchange.

Authors:  Kristof Vandekerckhove; Ilse Coomans; Annelies Moerman; Daniel De Wolf; Jan Boone
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Continuous sweep versus discrete step protocols for studying effects of wearable robot assistance magnitude.

Authors:  Philippe Malcolm; Denise Martineli Rossi; Christopher Siviy; Sangjun Lee; Brendan Thomas Quinlivan; Martin Grimmer; Conor J Walsh
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Establishing cut-points for physical activity classification using triaxial accelerometer in middle-aged recreational marathoners.

Authors:  Carlos Hernando; Carla Hernando; Eladio Joaquin Collado; Nayara Panizo; Ignacio Martinez-Navarro; Barbara Hernando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aerobic Interval Training Impacts Muscle and Brain Oxygenation Responses to Incremental Exercise.

Authors:  Kevin Caen; Kobe Vermeire; Silvia Pogliaghi; Annelies Moerman; Victor Niemeijer; Jan Gustaaf Bourgois; Jan Boone
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Ramp vs. step tests: valid alternatives to determine the maximal lactate steady-state intensity?

Authors:  Kevin Caen; Silvia Pogliaghi; Maarten Lievens; Kobe Vermeire; Jan G Bourgois; Jan Boone
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The effect of adding CO2 to hypoxic inspired gas on cerebral blood flow velocity and breathing during incremental exercise.

Authors:  Jui-Lin Fan; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quadriceps Muscles O2 Extraction and EMG Breakpoints during a Ramp Incremental Test.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Ahmad Qahtani; Guillaume Y Millet; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.