Literature DB >> 22571478

The reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials of hypertension using the CONSORT criteria for harm reporting.

Nitin Babulal Bagul1, Jamie J Kirkham.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of harms in hypertension clinical trials identified from the Cochrane Database using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for harms reporting. Forty-one hypertension trials were included in the study. On average trials reported less than half of the items recommended by the CONSORT extension for harms (mean 9.83 items; 95% confidence interval = 8.06, 11.60). Trialists need to address the perceived shortcomings in measurement, analysis, and reporting of harms data so that the available trial data can be considered as a balanced and reliable source of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571478     DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2012.681724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  6 in total

1.  Inadequate harms reporting in randomized control trials of antibiotics for pediatric acute otitis media: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie W Hum; Su Golder; Nader Shaikh
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension.

Authors:  Alex Hodkinson; Jamie J Kirkham; Catrin Tudur-Smith; Carrol Gamble
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Identification, collection, and reporting of harms among non-industry-sponsored randomized clinical trials of pharmacologic interventions in the critically ill population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ari Moskowitz; Lars W Andersen; Mathias J Holmberg; Anne V Grossestreuer; Katherine M Berg; Asger Granfeldt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pauline A J Steegmans; Shandra Bipat; Reint A Meursinge Reynders
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-05

5.  Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Pauline A J Steegmans; Nicola Di Girolamo; Reint A Meursinge Reynders
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  Declaration of transparency for each research article.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-08-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.