Literature DB >> 22568968

Dietary intake of meat, fruits, vegetables, and selective micronutrients and risk of bladder cancer in the New England region of the United States.

J W Wu1, A J Cross, D Baris, M H Ward, M R Karagas, A Johnson, M Schwenn, S Cherala, J S Colt, K P Cantor, N Rothman, D T Silverman, R Sinha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite many studies on diet and bladder cancer, there are areas that remain unexplored including meat mutagens, specific vegetable groups, and vitamins from diet.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study of bladder cancer in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. A total of 1171 cases were ascertained through hospital pathology records and cancer registries from 2001 to 2004. Overall, 1418 controls were identified from the Department of Motor Vehicles (<65 years) and Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (65-79 years) and were frequency-matched to cases by state, sex, and age (within 5 years). Diet was assessed with a self-administered Diet History Questionnaire. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: Processed meat intake was positively associated with bladder cancer (highest vs lowest quartile OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00-1.65; P(trend)=0.035), with a stronger association for processed red meat (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.08-1.84; P(trend)=0.024). There were no associations between intake of fruits or vegetables and bladder cancer. We did, however, observe an inverse association with vitamin B12 intake (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.99; P=0.019).
CONCLUSION: Vitamin B12 from diet may be protective against bladder cancer, whereas consuming processed meat may increase risk.
© 2012 Cancer Research UK

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22568968      PMCID: PMC3364127          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Over the past few decades, the incidence of bladder cancer has been relatively constant, with an estimated 70 530 Americans (52 760 men and 17 770 women) diagnosed with bladder cancer in 2010 (Howlader ). Diet is a source of carcinogenic and anticarcinogenic compounds, which may be excreted through the urine (Pelucchi ). However, there is a lack of consensus on the effects of diet on bladder cancer risk. In a 2007 review of the literature, no dietary components were ‘convincingly’, or even ‘probably’, associated with risk of bladder cancer (Marmot ). With the exception of one prospective cohort (Ferrucci ) and one case–control study, (García-Closas ) cooking preferences of meats, which determines the formation of mutagens such as heterocyclic amines (HCA) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), have not been studied extensively in relation to bladder cancer risk. However, these meat mutagens have been associated with an increased risk of breast, colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancer (Alaejos ; Zheng and Lee, 2009). Furthermore, HCAs induce tumours in multiple organs in animal studies (Ohgaki ), including the urinary tract (Hashida Takahashi ). In general, prospective cohort and case–control studies have demonstrated inconsistent results for the association between fruits and vegetables and bladder cancer (Riboli ; Shibata ; Chyou ; Bruemmer ; Michaud ; Nagano ; Wakai ; Balbi ; Zeegers ; García-Closas ). There is also a lack of consistent epidemiologic data that demonstrate one particular fruit or vegetable group is protective against bladder cancer, despite the fact that clinical studies that have shown specific vegetable groups, such as brassica and allium, activate glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), which act to minimise oxidative stress (Lampe ; Asaduzzaman Khan ). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis has shown that deletion of GST M1 (GSTM1) may increase the risk of bladder cancer (Jiang ). Similarly, several prospective cohort and case–control studies have evaluated the role of micronutrients in bladder cancer with variable results (Steineck ; Nomura ; Riboli ; Shibata ; Bruemmer ; Michaud ; Michaud ; Zeegers ; Michaud ; García-Closas ; Brinkman ; Hotaling ); however, there is evidence from laboratory and epidemiological studies that demonstrate certain micronutrients are associated with a reduced risk of specific cancer sites including the bladder (Greenwald ; Leppert ). In the Spanish bladder cancer study (García-Closas ), the authors found that higher compared with lower intakes of folate and B-vitamins were protective against bladder cancer and so our study aimed to confirm some of the results from that study. The Spanish bladder cancer study also analysed the role of meat cooking and related carcinogens. Therefore, we evaluated a range of dietary components, including meat (by cooking method and meat mutagens), fruits, vegetables, and micronutrients in relation to bladder cancer in a large population-based case–control study in northern New England.

Materials and Methods

Study population

The details of the design of the New England Bladder Cancer Study have been published elsewhere (Baris ). Briefly, newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed cases of urinary bladder carcinoma (including carcinoma in situ) aged 30–79 years were enroled in Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire. Enrolment of cases occurred between 1 September 2001 and 31 October 2004 in Maine and Vermont and between 1 January 2002 and 31 July 2004 in New Hampshire. Cases were ascertained through hospital pathology departments, hospital cancer registries, and the state cancer registries. Out of 1878 patients who were eligible for study, 1213 (65%) were interviewed. Reasons for non-participation included individuals who refused (50%), were deceased (22%), too ill (12%), did not speak English fluently (5.5%), had a physician refused (5%), or could not be located (5%). An expert pathologist conducted a blind review of the cases to confirm diagnosis, histological classification, and tumour stage and grade. After the review, 20 patients who were judged not to have bladder cancer and 22 who did not have urothelial carcinomas were excluded. We further excluded an additional 84 cases (7%) because they did not complete the Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) resulting in 1087 cases. Controls aged 30–64 and 65–79 years were identified from Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) records and by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), respectively. Controls had no previous history of bladder cancer and were frequency-matched to the bladder cancer cases by state, sex, and within 5 years of age at diagnosis of patients. There were 1418 control subjects interviewed, which accounted for 65% of the eligible individuals from the DMV and CMS (594 and 824, respectively). A total of 319 and 444 individuals from DMV and CMS, respectively, were eligible but did not participate, including refusals (DMV – 70% and CMS – 65%), those who could not be located (DMV – 24% and CMS – 11%), who did not speak English fluently (DMV – 3% and CMS – 10%), who were too ill (DMV – 1% and CMS – 7%), or deceased (DMV – 1% and CMS – 7%). Similar to the cases, 125 controls (9%) were not included in the analysis because the individuals did not complete the DHQ ensuing in 1293 control subjects. Individuals who agreed and consented to the study were interviewed at home by a trained interviewer using a detailed computer-assisted personal interview. The interviewer obtained information on demographics, use of tobacco products, occupational and residential histories, fluid intake, use of hair-colouring products, family history of cancer, and medication use.

Dietary assessment

Food intake over the past 5 years was assessed with a modified version of the self-administered 124 food item DHQ created by the National Cancer Institute, which included portion size and dietary supplement questions (Subar ). In general, we asked, ‘During the last 5 years, how often did you eat…’ in order to capture usual diet over the past 5 years. The DHQ was validated among an American population aged 50–71 years old from six states that did not include the New England region (Thompson ); however, the New England study population is similar to the validation population such that they were generally older, White non-Hispanic participants. Correlations between the DHQ and 24 h dietary recalls for fruits and vegetables were 0.61 and 0.72 and for red meat was 0.70 and 0.62 for women and men, respectively (Thompson ; Ferrucci ). The MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED 2.0) was utilised as a guideline to create food groups. Fruits were categorised as citrus/berries/melons (cantaloupe, melons, grapefruit, orange, and strawberry) and other fruits (apple, apricots, avocado, banana, grapes, peaches, nectarine, plum, pear, and plantain). Vegetables were grouped as cruciferous (coleslaw, cabbage/sauerkraut, broccoli, and cauliflower/brussel sprouts), dark green (spinach (cooked and raw) and broccoli), orange (carrots and sweet potatoes), starchy (corn, peas, and potatoes), other vegetables (green beans, celery, olives, onions, lettuce, peppers, and tomatoes), and beans. Meat and fish were categorised as red (beef, veal, pork, and lamb), white (chicken and turkey), tuna, and other fish (fried and non-fried fish). Processed meat included red processed (ham, bacon, sausage, hot dog, and cold cuts) and white processed (turkey sausages and hot dogs, and poultry cold cuts). Vitamins from the diet were estimated by linking food codes from the United States Department of Agriculture’s 1994 to 1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) to those from the Nutrient Data Systems for Research (NDS-R) (Dixon ). Information was collected on how the meat and fish was cooked – baked, broiled, microwaved, pan-fried, or barbequed. Heterocyclic amines included 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoxaline (DiMeIQx), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoxaline (MeIQx), and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo(4,5-b)pyridine (PhIP) and benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) intake was estimated as a marker for PAH. Total mutagenic activity, which measures mutagenicity from all meat-related mutagens, was also estimated (Ferrucci ). Meat-cooking methods, HCAs, B(a)P, and total mutagenic activity were analysed using Computerized Heterocylic Amines Resource for Research in Epidemiology of Disease (CHARRED) (Sinha ).

Statistical analysis

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. For the meat variables, all models summed to total meat; for example, red and white meat were included in the same model, as was tuna and other fish. Dietary variables were energy-adjusted using the multivariate nutrient-density method. We excluded individuals with energy intake that fell in the 1st or 99th percentiles (n=44). Quartiles were created for the dietary variables and determined based on the distribution among the controls. Multivariate models were adjusted for gender, age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, or 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White or other), Hispanic status (yes or no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, or current), usual body mass index (BMI – kg m−2, continuous), and total energy (kcal per day, continuous). For the smoking status variable, ‘never smokers’ were defined as individuals who had <100 cigarettes in their lifetime. ‘Occasional smokers’ consumed >100 cigarettes but not on a regular basis (i.e. at least one cigarette per day for at least 6 months). ‘Former smokers’ were individuals who quit smoking 1 year or more before the diagnosis date for case patients or selection date for control subjects, whereas ‘current smokers’ were regularly smoking at the time of their interview or had quit < 1 year before the reference date. More refined adjustment for smoking, including pack-years and number of cigarettes, for example, did not alter our results. Missing or unknown values were imputed with the median value of the variable. Individuals who did not have a known smoking status were excluded (n=2). Adjustment for education, occupation, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not affect the association; therefore, these covariates were not included in the final model. P-values for linear trends were calculated using the quartile median values. Test for interactions were also conducted using the Wald statistic. Data analyses were calculated using SAS Version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and all P-values were two-tailed with an α level of 0.05.

Results

A total of 1068 cases (811 men and 257 women) and 1266 controls (927 men and 339 women) were included in our analysis (Table 1). The cases and controls were mostly from Maine and New Hampshire. The majority of the study subjects were White (94.5% and 94.7% for cases and controls, respectively). Cases were more likely to be current smokers compared with controls (30.1% vs 13.5%, P<0.001). BMI was similar among cases (26.2±4.4 kg m−2) and controls (26.0±4.1 kg m−2). Total energy intake among cases and controls was 2041±793 and 1987±711 kcal per day, respectively. A comparison between the controls recruited from the DMV vs CMS showed no difference in the baseline characteristics except for region and total energy intake; a higher proportion of controls from the DMV were from Vermont compared with CMS controls, and controls from the DMV had a higher total energy intake compared with those from CMS (2089±707 and 1920±706 kcal, respectively).
Table 1

Characteristics of cases and controlsa

Variable Cases Controls P value c
N (%)1068 (45.8)1266 (54.2) 
   
Region  0.138
 Maine523 (49.0)664 (52.5) 
 Vermont188 (17.6)226 (17.8) 
 New Hampshire357 (33.4)376 (29.7) 
   
Age (years)  0.662
 30–54158 (14.8)195 (15.4) 
 55–64274 (25.7)305 (24.1) 
 65–74404 (37.8)504 (39.8) 
 75+232 (21.7)262 (20.7) 
   
Gender  0.134
 Male811 (75.0)927 (73.2) 
 Female257 (24.1)339 (26.8) 
   
Race  0.386
 White1009 (94.5)1197 (94.7) 
 Native Americans52 (4.9)53 (4.2) 
 Other7 (0.7)14 (1.1) 
   
Hispanic status  0.587
 Yes20 (1.9)20 (1.6) 
 No1048 (98.1)1246 (98.4) 
   
Smoking status  <0.001
 Non-smoker162 (15.2)425 (33.6) 
 Occasional18 (1.7)39 (3.1) 
 Former567 (53.1)631 (49.8) 
 Current321 (30.1)171 (13.5) 
   
Usual BMI (kg m−2)b26.2±4.426.0±4.10.189
Energy (kcal per day)b2041±7931987±7110.081

Abbreviation: BMI=body mass index.

The numbers in brackets are percentages.

This is a continuous variable and a mean and a SD are given in the format of mean±SD.

P-values were tabulated using χ2 tests (categorical variables) or t-tests (continuous variables).

Individuals in the highest, compared with those in the lowest, quartile of processed meat intake had an increased risk of bladder cancer in multivariate models (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00–1.65; Ptrend=0.035; Table 2); the association was slightly stronger for processed red meat specifically (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.08–1.84; Ptrend=0.024). In contrast, no association with bladder cancer was apparent for intake of processed white meat (high vs low intake: OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.91–1.49; Ptrend=0.192). Given that a positive association for processed red meat was observed, we investigated specific processed meat groups. There was no significant linear, increased risk of bladder cancer associated with intake of bacon, or sausages; however, those in the highest intake category of ham (not lunchmeat), cold cuts, and hot dog compared with the lowest had a moderate, non-significant increase in risk (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00–1.68; Ptrend=0.072; OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.94–1.55; Ptrend=0.047; and OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.91–1.53; Ptrend=0.026, respectively). We did not observe any association between consumption of tuna or other types of fish and bladder cancer.
Table 2

Meat and fish intake and risk of bladder cancera,b

     Multivariate model c
Quartiles of intake Median (g per 1000, kcal) Cases Controls OR 95% CI
Red meat
Q117.22413161.00 
Q227.62543170.97(0.76, 1.24)
Q337.42693171.04(0.81, 1.33)
Q453.03043161.14(0.89, 1.46)
P trend    0.258 
      
White meat      
Q19.63203161.00 
Q217.62673170.94(0.73, 1.20)
Q327.72363160.85(0.65, 1.11)
Q451.02453170.89(0.67, 1.18)
P trend    0.428 
      
Processed meat
Q12.92263161.00 
Q26.12463171.01(0.78, 1.30)
Q310.12873161.19(0.92, 1.53)
Q418.43093171.28(1.00, 1.65)
P trend    0.035 
      
 Red, processed
 Q11.92003161.00 
 Q24.32633171.24(0.96, 1.60)
 Q37.42893161.39(1.07, 1.81)
 Q413.53163171.41(1.08, 1.84)
Ptrend   0.024 
      
 White, processed
 Q102783171.00 
 Q20.52433160.99(0.77, 1.26)
 Q31.52703171.07(0.84, 1.36)
 Q45.82773161.17(0.91, 1.49)
Ptrend   0.192 
      
Total tuna
Q10.32623161.00 
Q21.12543171.11(0.87, 1.43)
Q32.22953171.23(0.96, 1.58)
Q45.32573161.10(0.85, 1.43)
P trend    0.975 
      
Other fish
Q10.83563161.00 
Q22.22243170.65(0.51, 0.83)
Q34.12353170.74(0.57, 0.94)
Q48.92533160.84(0.65, 1.10)
P trend    0.452 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence intervals; OR=odds ratios.

Ptrends were calculated using the median value for each quartile.

All models included total meat and fish intakes.

Adjusted for gender (female/male), age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White/other), Hispanic status (yes/no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, current), usual BMI (kg m−2 – continuous), and total energy (kcal per day – continuous).

Barbequed and pan-fried meats were not associated with bladder cancer when comparing those in the highest with those in the lowest quartile (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.78–1.29; Ptrend=0.649 and OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.86–1.40; Ptrend=0.942; respectively) (Table 3). Furthermore, there was no association between intakes of MeIQx, DiMeIQx, PhIP, B(α)P, total mutagenicity, or haeme iron intake and bladder cancer (Table 4).
Table 3

Meat-cooking methods and risk of bladder cancera

     Multivariate model b
Quartiles of intake Median (g per 1000, kcal) Cases Controls OR 95% CI
Baking/microwaving/broiling
 Q10.42613171.00 
 Q22.22703161.07(0.84, 1.36)
 Q35.02863171.13(0.89, 1.44)
 Q412.62513161.00(0.78, 1.29)
Ptrend   0.814 
 
Barbequed
 Q102603171.00 
 Q21.52983161.15(0.91, 1.47)
 Q34.12653161.04(0.81, 1.32)
 Q410.22453171.00(0.78, 1.29)
Ptrend   0.649 
 
Pan-fried
 Q10.22283171.00 
 Q21.62903161.23(0.96, 1.57)
 Q33.92393160.92(0.71, 1.18)
 Q49.53113171.10(0.86, 1.40)
Ptrend   0.942 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence intervals; OR=odds ratios.

Ptrends were calculated using the median value for each quartile.

Adjusted for gender (female/male), age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White/other), Hispanic status (yes/no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, current), usual BMI (kg m−2 – continuous), and total energy (kcal per day – continuous).

Table 4

Meat mutagens and haeme iron in relation to bladder cancera

     Multivariate model b
Quartiles of intake Median Cases Controls OR 95% CI
MeIQx (ngs)
 Q12.92433171.00 
 Q28.42653161.10(0.86, 1.41)
 Q317.62523170.95(0.74, 1.22)
 Q443.73083161.04(0.81, 1.33)
Ptrend   0.999 
 
DiMeIQx (ngs)
 Q102453171.00 
 Q20.42743171.10(0.86, 1.40)
 Q31.02653161.02(0.80, 1.30)
 Q43.02843161.01(0.79, 1.30)
Ptrend   0.822 
 
PhIP (ngs)
 Q15.22503171.00 
 Q217.22463160.95(0.74, 1.21)
 Q339.13293171.26(0.99, 1.60)
 Q4117.62433160.90(0.70, 1.17)
Ptrend   0.334 
 
B(a)P (ngs)
 Q10.32643171.00 
 Q21.82783161.06(0.83, 1.34)
 Q38.92663171.01(0.79, 1.28)
 Q439.72603161.02(0.80, 1.31)
Ptrend   0.969 
 
Mutagenic activity
 Q1430.12583171.00 
 Q21087.72433160.92(0.72, 1.18)
 Q32166.02913171.04(0.82, 1.33)
 Q45415.22763160.93(0.72, 1.19)
Ptrend   0.652 
 
Haeme iron (mcg)
 Q1111.62433171.00 
 Q2220.52573161.01(0.78, 1.28)
 Q3338.12623170.99(0.77, 1.28)
 Q4565.53063161.08(0.82, 1.42)
Ptrend   0.558 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence intervals; OR=odds ratios.

Ptrends were calculated using the median value for each quartile.

Adjusted for gender (female/male), age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White/other), Hispanic status (yes/no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, current), usual BMI (kg m−2 – continuous), and total energy (kcal per day – continuous).

Although the unadjusted models indicated inverse associations between the ‘citrus, melons and berries’ food group, as well as ‘cruciferous vegetables’, ‘dark green vegetables’ and ‘orange vegetables’ and bladder cancer (data not shown), these associations were attenuated after multivariate adjustment (Table 5). The smoking variable was the strongest confounder for the association between the fruit and vegetable groups and bladder cancer.
Table 5

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of bladder cancera

     Multivariate model b
Quartiles of intake Median (g per 1000, kcal) Cases Controls OR 95% CI
Total Fruits
 Q133.62953171.00 
 Q283.02673161.11(0.87, 1.42)
 Q3135.42563161.11(0.86, 1.42)
 Q4227.72503171.13(0.88, 1.46)
Ptrend   0.404 
 
 Citrus, melons, and berries
  Q13.92983171.00 
  Q28.62813161.06(0.84, 1.35)
  Q315.52623171.03(0.81, 1.31)
  Q438.52273160.94(0.73, 1.21)
  Ptrend   0.444 
 
 Other fruits
  Q17.93043161.00 
  Q224.42593171.01(0.79, 1.27)
  Q349.32623171.16(0.91, 1.48)
  Q494.62433161.08(0.84, 1.39)
  Ptrend   0.447 
 
Total vegetables
 Q164.62903161.00 
 Q299.12613170.97(0.76, 1.23)
 Q3130.32823161.06(0.84, 1.35)
 Q4187.82353170.90(0.70, 1.16)
Ptrend   0.495 
 
 Cruciferous vegetables
  Q12.63053161.00 
  Q27.62643170.93(0.74, 1.18)
  Q313.42743160.99(0.78, 1.25)
  Q423.32253170.84(0.65, 1.07)
  Ptrend   0.192 
 
 Dark green vegetables
  Q11.23253171.00 
  Q24.12483160.86(0.68, 1.09)
  Q39.02653160.89(0.70, 1.13)
  Q422.72303170.82(0.64, 1.05)
  Ptrend   0.199 
 
 Orange vegetables
  Q10.73293161.00 
  Q21.82683170.92(0.72, 1.16)
  Q33.52513170.90(0.71, 1.14)
  Q48.32203160.82(0.64, 1.06)
  Ptrend   0.150 
 
 Starchy vegetables
  Q114.42643161.00 
  Q227.52753170.98(0.77, 1.24)
  Q341.42723171.03(0.81, 1.31)
  Q463.92473160.93(0.73, 1.20)
  Ptrend   0.662 
 
 Other vegetables
  Q114.92833171.00 
  Q226.62673161.02(0.81, 1.31)
  Q339.72513170.99(0.78, 1.26)
  Q466.32673161.03(0.81, 1.32)
  Ptrend   0.822 
 
Total Beans
 Q10.63023161.00 
 Q22.52693170.97(0.77, 1.24)
 Q35.62413170.88(0.69, 1.12)
 Q412.12563160.95(0.75, 1.22)
Ptrend   0.686 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence intervals; OR=odds ratios.

Ptrends were calculated using the median value for each quartile.

Adjusted for gender (female/male), age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White/other), Hispanic status (yes/no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, current), usual BMI (kg m−2 – continuous), and total energy (kcal per day – continuous).

In general, vitamins and minerals obtained from the diet were not associated with bladder cancer after multivariate adjustment (Table 6), with the exception of vitamin B12. Individuals in the highest, compared with the lowest, quartile of vitamin B12 intake had a lower risk of bladder cancer (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.99; P=0.019). Vitamins acquired from supplements were not associated with bladder cancer, including vitamin B12 (data not shown).
Table 6

Vitamins from diet and risk of bladder cancera

     Multivariate model b
Quartiles of intake Median Cases Controls OR 95% CI
Vitamin A (mcg per 1000, kcal)
 Q1279.83073161.00 
 Q2356.42763170.98(0.78, 1.24)
 Q3432.92573170.94(0.74, 1.20)
 Q4551.32283160.85(0.66, 1.08)
Ptrend   0.165 
 
Vitamin B2 (mg per 1000, kcal)
 Q10.72933171.00 
 Q20.92893161.05(0.83, 1.33)
 Q31.02653171.00(0.79, 1.27)
 Q41.32213160.90(0.70, 1.15)
Ptrend   0.308 
 
Vitamin B6 (mg per 1000, kcal)
 Q10.73073171.00 
 Q20.92953161.11(0.88, 1.41)
 Q31.12413160.96(0.75, 1.22)
 Q41.42253170.93(0.72, 1.20)
Ptrend   0.372 
 
Vitamin B12 (mcg per 1000, kcal)
 Q11.83153161.00 
 Q22.42823170.92(0.73, 1.17)
 Q33.12333170.76(0.60, 0.97)
 Q44.12383160.77(0.61, 0.99)
Ptrend   0.019 
 
Vitamin C (mg per 1000, kcal)
 Q132.32883171.00 
 Q253.12613161.06(0.83, 1.35)
 Q371.62573161.10(0.86, 1.40)
 Q4104.62623171.15(0.90, 1.47)
Ptrend   0.265 
 
Vitamin E (mg per 1000, kcal)
 Q12.93353171.00 
 Q23.62663160.91(0.72, 1.15)
 Q34.22233170.79(0.62, 1.00)
 Q45.62443160.91(0.71, 1.15)
Ptrend   0.405 
 
Folate (mcg per 1000, kcal)
 Q1138.82863171.00 
 Q2174.42863161.10(0.87, 1.40)
 Q3205.72593171.10(0.86, 1.41)
 Q4255.82373161.06(0.82, 1.37)
Ptrend   0.708 
 
α-Carotene (mcg per 1000, kcal)
 Q199.32833161.00 
 Q2171.92823171.08(0.85, 1.37)
 Q3262.22773161.06(0.84, 1.35)
 Q4468.12263170.94(0.73, 1.20)
Ptrend   0.449 
 
β-Carotene (mcg per 1000, kcal)
 Q1615.92923171.00 
 Q2986.02733161.04(0.82, 1.32)
 Q31439.62593160.99(0.77, 1.26)
 Q42347.62443170.99(0.77, 1.27)
Ptrend   0.838 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence intervals; OR=odds ratios.

Ptrend were calculated using the median value for each quartile.

Adjusted for gender (female/male), age (0–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+ years), region (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), race (White/other), Hispanic status (yes/no), smoking status (never, occasional, former, current), usual BMI (kg m−2 – continuous), and total energy (kcal per day – continuous).

For most dietary variables, we did not find any differences by smoking status, except among never smokers we observed decreased risks for those in the highest vs lowest category of vegetables, vitamin E, and α-carotene (Supplementary Table 1), but none of the interaction terms were statistically significant (P>0.05). Other results stratified by age, gender, region, or BMI were not materially different from the overall findings (data not shown).

Discussion

In this large population-based case–control study, higher intake of processed meat, and processed red meat in particular, was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; although meat-cooking methods, HCAs and B(a)P were not associated with risk. We found no statistically significant associations between fruits or vegetables and bladder cancer. Individuals in the highest quartile of dietary vitamin B12 intake had a decreased risk of bladder cancer. In agreement with our findings, many previous studies have not found an association between total or red meat and bladder cancer (Riboli ; Chyou ; Tavani ; Wakai ; Balbi ; Cross ; García-Closas ; Aune ; Larsson ; Ferrucci ; Jakszyn ). However, one cohort study found a positive association between total meat intake and bladder cancer (Mills ), and another found an increased risk for high total processed meat intake (Hu ). Consumption of specific processed meat groups, such as bacon, cold cuts, ham, hot dogs, or sausages, have previously been linked to bladder cancer risk in some (Chyou ; Michaud ; Larsson ; Ferrucci ) but not all studies (Chyou ; Michaud ; Larsson ; Ferrucci ). Meat is a source of multiple mutagenic compounds such as HCAs, PAHs, and N-nitroso compounds (NOCs). Previous animal studies have demonstrated HCAs, such as MeIQx and PhIP, affects the urinary system as well as other organ systems (Ohgaki ; Takahashi ; Shirai ). However, similar to our data, meat cooking preferences and mutagens have not been associated with bladder cancer in other studies (Augustsson ; García-Closas ; Ferrucci ). Dietary intake of MeIQx, DiMeIQx, and PhIP in our study was lower than in a previous study in Spain (García-Closas ), but was higher compared with another US study population (Ferrucci ). Processed meat is also a source of NOCs, which are formed from nitrate and nitrite, and they can cause tumours at multiple organ sites in many animal species (Bogovski and Bogovski, 1981), including the urinary bladder (Mirvish, 1995). In a recent cohort study, processed meat intake was not associated with bladder cancer, but total nitrate and nitrite intake from processed meats had a borderline positive association with bladder cancer (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00–1.67; P=0.110) (Ferrucci ). In contrast, another recent cohort study that estimated NOC exposure in relation to bladder cancer was null (Jakszyn ). Although the findings between HCAs, PAHs, and NOCs in relation to bladder cancer have been null or inconsistent, the weakness of effect may be due to the inherent design of epidemiological studies where exposures are measured from self-reported dietary intake of individual foods ensuing in non-differential misclassification of exposure and dilution of the observed effect (Eichholzer and Gutzwiller, 1998; Sinha, 2002). In our study, we did not find any associations between fruit intake and bladder cancer. Other studies have also found null results (Shibata ; Michaud ; Nagano ; Michaud ); only one study has shown a statistically significant reduction in bladder cancer risk for individuals in the highest category of fruit intake compared with the lowest (Zeegers ). Other research studies have shown that specific fruit or vegetable groups have some protective effects but the findings are highly variable across the studies (Michaud ; Nagano ); for example, in a Spanish case–control study, berries were inversely related to bladder cancer, whereas in a Finnish cohort study there was no association (Michaud ; García-Closas ). We did not find any specific fruit or vegetable group to be protective against bladder cancer, which is similar to the findings of other prospective cohort studies (Shibata ; Zeegers ; Michaud ). Two case-control and cohort studies have observed inverse associations with specific vitamins such as A, B12, C and E (Shibata ; Bruemmer ; Michaud ; García-Closas ); however, other studies have found no evidence for a protective effect of vitamins (Nomura ; Riboli ; Michaud ; Wakai ; Zeegers ; Michaud ; Brinkman ; Hotaling ). Micronutrients can potentially prevent carcinogenesis and inhibit tumour growth through a multitude of biological mechanisms (Greenwald ; Steinmetz and Potter, 1991); for example, carotenoids increase cell differentiation, vitamin C prevents formation of NOCs, vitamin E has intracellular antioxidant properties, and vitamin D and calcium decrease cellular proliferation (Steinmetz and Potter, 1991; Greenwald ). Dietary vitamin B12 was inversely associated with bladder cancer in our study; this association was also observed in a Spanish population in diet and vitamin supplements (García-Closas ). The main sources of vitamin B12 include fish, meat, poultry, eggs, milk, and milk products, with 27% of the micronutrient coming from beef (Subar ). Vitamin B12, as well as folic acid, is needed for methylation in DNA metabolism (Fenech, 2001 Fenech ). Deficiencies in vitamin B12 may result in high incorporation of uracil into the DNA, thus leading to chromosomal breakage, which has implications for cancer risk. However, more studies are needed to elucidate the biological mechanism between vitamin B12 and bladder cancer specifically. The strengths of this study are the large sample size and the comprehensive validated dietary questionnaire. Furthermore, this study was located in a region with high bladder cancer incidence and mortality (Brown ). One of the limitations of our study is the 60% participation rate, although this was approximately the same among both the cases and controls. The main reason for non-participation in the cases was because 22% of the eligible cases had died before entry to the study. The main reason for non-participation among the controls was refusals, with 23.5% of eligible controls refusing to participate. Using data on some of the non-respondent cases from the state cancer registries, we observed that non-respondent cases did not seem to differ by sex or cancer stage compared with respondents. We also found a low percent of cancers were at high stage, and this was similar among those who participated and those who did not. Selection bias is a potential limitation in case–control studies; however, the characteristics of our study participants are similar to the NHANES 1999–2002 study population, which is representative of the general population in the USA (Ong ; Seligman ). In comparison with a cohort study, our study population characteristics, dietary intake and the associations observed was similar (Ferrucci ). Moreover, the aggressive and non-aggressive bladder cancer cases in our study did not differ by major dietary factors (red and processed meat, fruits, and vegetables), age, race, Hispanic status, region, smoking, and BMI except for gender. As in most case–control studies of diet, there is also a concern regarding differential recall bias between cases and controls, which is a potential weakness of our study. Issues of measurement error associated with assessing usual dietary intake in large epidemiologic studies are also a concern but it will most likely be non-differential misclassification resulting in an underestimation of the true association. Furthermore, since we investigated multiple exposures, there is a possibility that associations may have been observed by chance. In summary, we observed a positive association between processed meat intake and bladder cancer, especially for processed red meat. Furthermore, individuals who consumed larger amounts of vitamin B12 had a decreased risk for this malignancy. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of processed meat and vitamin B12 in bladder carcinogenesis as we have seen some inconsistencies in the current literature.
  53 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of bladder cancer: a review.

Authors:  John T Leppert; Oleg Shvarts; Kelly Kawaoka; Ron Lieberman; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1989 to 1991.

Authors:  A F Subar; S M Krebs-Smith; A Cook; L L Kahle
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1998-05

3.  Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of bladder cancer in a male prospective cohort.

Authors:  D S Michaud; D Spiegelman; S K Clinton; E B Rimm; W C Willett; E L Giovannucci
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Mechanisms of disease: The epidemiology of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Pelucchi; Cristina Bosetti; Eva Negri; Matteo Malvezzi; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2006-06

5.  Dietary heterocyclic amines and cancer of the colon, rectum, bladder, and kidney: a population-based study.

Authors:  K Augustsson; K Skog; M Jägerstad; P W Dickman; G Steineck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Development of a food frequency questionnaire module and databases for compounds in cooked and processed meats.

Authors:  Rashmi Sinha; Amanda Cross; Jane Curtin; Thea Zimmerman; Susanne McNutt; Adam Risch; Joanne Holden
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.914

7.  Use of polyclonal antibodies against carcinogen-DNA adducts in analysis of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  T Shirai; S Takahashi; L Cui; Y Yamada; M Tada; F F Kadlubar; N Ito
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1998-12-28       Impact factor: 4.372

8.  High bladder cancer mortality in rural New England (United States): an etiologic study.

Authors:  L M Brown; S H Zahm; R N Hoover; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine status and DNA damage in young Australian adults.

Authors:  M Fenech; C Aitken; J Rinaldi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Nutrient intake in relation to bladder cancer among middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  B Bruemmer; E White; T L Vaughan; C L Cheney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  22 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer: associations of inflammatory potential of diet, cigarette smoking and long-standing diabetes.

Authors:  Samuel O Antwi; Ann L Oberg; Nitin Shivappa; William R Bamlet; Kari G Chaffee; Susan E Steck; James R Hébert; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Ingested Nitrate and Nitrite and Bladder Cancer in Northern New England.

Authors:  Kathryn Hughes Barry; Rena R Jones; Kenneth P Cantor; Laura E Beane Freeman; David C Wheeler; Dalsu Baris; Alison T Johnson; G Monawar Hosain; Molly Schwenn; Han Zhang; Rashmi Sinha; Stella Koutros; Margaret R Karagas; Debra T Silverman; Mary H Ward
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Potential effect modifiers of the arsenic-bladder cancer risk relationship.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Dalsu Baris; Richard Waddell; Laura E Beane Freeman; Joanne S Colt; Molly Schwenn; Alison Johnson; Mary H Ward; Gm Monawar Hosain; Lee E Moore; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Nathaniel Rothman; Margaret R Karagas; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated with the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shenghui Wu; Yanning Liu; Joel E Michalek; Ruben A Mesa; Dorothy Long Parma; Ronald Rodriguez; Ahmed M Mansour; Robert Svatek; Thomas C Tucker; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Vitamin C and E intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Yu-Yong Wang; Xu-Liang Wang; Zhi-Jian Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

6.  Fruit and Vegetable Intake is Inversely Associated with Cancer Risk in Mexican-Americans.

Authors:  Shenghui Wu; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Belinda M Reininger; Miryoung Lee; Joseph B McCormick
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.900

7.  Diet Quality and Survival in a Population-Based Bladder Cancer Study.

Authors:  Reno C Leeming; Margaret R Karagas; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Jennifer A Emond; Michael S Zens; Alan R Schned; John D Seigne; Michael N Passarelli
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Elevated Bladder Cancer in Northern New England: The Role of Drinking Water and Arsenic.

Authors:  Dalsu Baris; Richard Waddell; Laura E Beane Freeman; Molly Schwenn; Joanne S Colt; Joseph D Ayotte; Mary H Ward; John Nuckols; Alan Schned; Brian Jackson; Castine Clerkin; Nathaniel Rothman; Lee E Moore; Anne Taylor; Gilpin Robinson; Gm Monawar Hosain; Karla R Armenti; Richard McCoy; Claudine Samanic; Robert N Hoover; Joseph F Fraumeni; Alison Johnson; Margaret R Karagas; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Targeted and Untargeted Detection of DNA Adducts of Aromatic Amine Carcinogens in Human Bladder by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jingshu Guo; Peter W Villalta; Christopher J Weight; Radha Bonala; Francis Johnson; Thomas A Rosenquist; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 10.  Can Diet Prevent Urological Cancers? An Update on Carotenoids as Chemopreventive Agents.

Authors:  Tomasz Konecki; Aleksandra Juszczak; Marcin Cichocki
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.