S Woods1, N N Clarke, R Layfield, K C F Fone. 1. School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 5-HT(6) receptors are abundant in the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens and striatum, supporting their role in learning and memory. Selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonists produce pro-cognitive effects in several learning and memory paradigms while 5-HT(6) receptor agonists have been found to enhance and impair memory. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The conditioned emotion response (CER) paradigm was validated in rats. Then we examined the effect of the 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist, EMD 386088 (10 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.), and agonists, E-6801 (2.5 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.) and EMD 386088 (5 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.) on CER-induced behaviour either alone or after induction of memory impairment by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine (0.3 mg·kg(-1) , i.p) or the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.1 mg·kg(-1) , i.p). KEY RESULTS: Pairing unavoidable foot shocks with a light and tone cue during CER training induced a robust freezing response, providing a quantitative index of contextual memory when the rat was returned to the shock chamber 24 h later. Pretreatment (-20 min pre-training) with scopolamine or MK-801 reduced contextual freezing 24 h after CER training, showing production of memory impairment. Immediate post-training administration of 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist, SB-270146, and agonists, EMD 386088 and E-6801, had little effect on CER freezing when given alone, but all significantly reversed scopolamine- and MK-801-induced reduction in freezing. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Both the 5-HT(6) receptor agonists and antagonist reversed cholinergic- and glutamatergic-induced deficits in associative learning. These findings support the therapeutic potential of 5-HT(6) receptor compounds in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction, such as seen in Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 5-HT(6) receptors are abundant in the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens and striatum, supporting their role in learning and memory. Selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonists produce pro-cognitive effects in several learning and memory paradigms while 5-HT(6) receptor agonists have been found to enhance and impair memory. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The conditioned emotion response (CER) paradigm was validated in rats. Then we examined the effect of the 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist, EMD 386088 (10 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.), and agonists, E-6801 (2.5 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.) and EMD 386088 (5 mg·kg(-1) , i.p.) on CER-induced behaviour either alone or after induction of memory impairment by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine (0.3 mg·kg(-1) , i.p) or the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.1 mg·kg(-1) , i.p). KEY RESULTS: Pairing unavoidable foot shocks with a light and tone cue during CER training induced a robust freezing response, providing a quantitative index of contextual memory when the rat was returned to the shock chamber 24 h later. Pretreatment (-20 min pre-training) with scopolamine or MK-801 reduced contextual freezing 24 h after CER training, showing production of memory impairment. Immediate post-training administration of 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist, SB-270146, and agonists, EMD 386088 and E-6801, had little effect on CER freezing when given alone, but all significantly reversed scopolamine- and MK-801-induced reduction in freezing. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Both the 5-HT(6) receptor agonists and antagonist reversed cholinergic- and glutamatergic-induced deficits in associative learning. These findings support the therapeutic potential of 5-HT(6) receptor compounds in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction, such as seen in Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.
Authors: R Kohen; M A Metcalf; N Khan; T Druck; K Huebner; J E Lachowicz; H Y Meltzer; D R Sibley; B L Roth; M W Hamblin Journal: J Neurochem Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Mark D Lindner; Donald B Hodges; John B Hogan; Anitra F Orie; Jason A Corsa; Donna M Barten; Craig Polson; Barbara J Robertson; Valerie L Guss; Kevin W Gillman; John E Starrett; Valentin K Gribkoff Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: M Ruat; E Traiffort; J M Arrang; J Tardivel-Lacombe; J Diaz; R Leurs; J C Schwartz Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1993-05-28 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: M Hoefer; S C Allison; G F Schauer; J M Neuhaus; J Hall; J N Dang; M W Weiner; B L Miller; H J Rosen Journal: Brain Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Anand M Bokare; A K Praveenkumar; Mandar Bhonde; Yogendra Nayak; Ravindra Pal; Rajan Goel Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: M Lamar Seibenhener; Ting Zhao; Yifeng Du; Luis Calderilla-Barbosa; Jin Yan; Jianxiong Jiang; Marie W Wooten; Michael C Wooten Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2013-04-13 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Allison L McIntosh; Theresa M Ballard; Lucinda J Steward; Paula M Moran; Kevin C F Fone Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-02-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: A Meneses; G Perez-Garcia; G Liy-Salmeron; T Ponce-López; E Lacivita; M Leopoldo Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 4.530