BACKGROUND: Transient ischaemic dilation (TID) on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an important finding, conveying a high risk of subsequent cardiac events. However, the mechanism leading to TID on MPI is not well elucidated. This study aimed to determine if TID is due to true LV cavity dilation and ventricular stunning, or is due to relative subendocardial hypoperfusion. METHODS: 31 patients undergoing single-day Tc-99m adenosine sestamibi MPI were recruited. All had routine ECG-gated single-day rest-stress adenosine MPI, with transthoracic echocardiograms (echo) acquired concurrently at rest, and both immediately, and 2 hours, post-stress. Echocardiography was performed using a Vivid-7 (GE). LV volumes and LVEF were quantified blinded to MPI results, using biplane Simpson method on echo, and quantitatively (including TID) with QGS(®), on MPI. RESULTS: Patients were divided into quartiles for TID, with the top quartile considered TID positive [TID+ 9/31 (TID ratio 1.3 ± 0.09)], and TID negative [TID- 22/31 (TID ratio 1.01 ± 0.04)]. There was good correlation between resting echo and MPI physical measurements (LVEDV r(2) = 0.79, LVESV r(2) = 0.9, and LVEF r(2) = 0.75). On MPI, a significant drop in LVEF was observed between rest and early stress in the TID+ group (56.6% vs 46.5%, P < .002), as well as an increase in both LVESV (62 vs 79 mls, P < .0001) and LVEDV (113 vs 131 mls, P < .0001). However, no statistically significant change in LVEF, LVESV or LVEDV was identified on concurrent echo imaging (LVEF 57% vs 56%, P < .66; LVESV 48 vs 54 mls, P < .26; LVEDV 87 vs 97 mls, P < .299). No significant change in LVEF or ventricular volumes was noted in the TID- group by either echo or MPI. CONCLUSION: Transient dilation of the left ventricle on adenosine MPI is not related to chamber enlargement and myocardial stunning, but is more likely a function of subendocardial hypoperfusion and impaired coronary flow reserve.
BACKGROUND: Transient ischaemic dilation (TID) on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an important finding, conveying a high risk of subsequent cardiac events. However, the mechanism leading to TID on MPI is not well elucidated. This study aimed to determine if TID is due to true LV cavity dilation and ventricular stunning, or is due to relative subendocardial hypoperfusion. METHODS: 31 patients undergoing single-day Tc-99m adenosine sestamibi MPI were recruited. All had routine ECG-gated single-day rest-stress adenosine MPI, with transthoracic echocardiograms (echo) acquired concurrently at rest, and both immediately, and 2 hours, post-stress. Echocardiography was performed using a Vivid-7 (GE). LV volumes and LVEF were quantified blinded to MPI results, using biplane Simpson method on echo, and quantitatively (including TID) with QGS(®), on MPI. RESULTS:Patients were divided into quartiles for TID, with the top quartile considered TID positive [TID+ 9/31 (TID ratio 1.3 ± 0.09)], and TID negative [TID- 22/31 (TID ratio 1.01 ± 0.04)]. There was good correlation between resting echo and MPI physical measurements (LVEDV r(2) = 0.79, LVESV r(2) = 0.9, and LVEF r(2) = 0.75). On MPI, a significant drop in LVEF was observed between rest and early stress in the TID+ group (56.6% vs 46.5%, P < .002), as well as an increase in both LVESV (62 vs 79 mls, P < .0001) and LVEDV (113 vs 131 mls, P < .0001). However, no statistically significant change in LVEF, LVESV or LVEDV was identified on concurrent echo imaging (LVEF 57% vs 56%, P < .66; LVESV 48 vs 54 mls, P < .26; LVEDV 87 vs 97 mls, P < .299). No significant change in LVEF or ventricular volumes was noted in the TID- group by either echo or MPI. CONCLUSION: Transient dilation of the left ventricle on adenosine MPI is not related to chamber enlargement and myocardial stunning, but is more likely a function of subendocardial hypoperfusion and impaired coronary flow reserve.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Louise Emmett; Michael Magee; S Ben Freedman; Hans Van der Wall; Vivienne Bush; Joseph Trieu; William Van Gaal; Kevin C Allman; Leonard Kritharides Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G Ambrosio; S Betocchi; L Pace; M A Losi; P Perrone-Filardi; A Soricelli; F Piscione; J Taube; F Squame; M Salvatore; J L Weiss; M Chiariello Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-11-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: E Barnes; C S Baker; D P Dutka; O Rimoldi; C A Rinaldi; P Nihoyannopoulos; P G Camici; R J Hall Journal: Heart Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: A T Weiss; D S Berman; A S Lew; J Nielsen; B Potkin; H J Swan; A Waxman; J Maddahi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1987-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Louise Emmett; William J Van Gaal; Michael Magee; Sarah Bass; Onn Ali; S Ben Freedman; Hans Van der Wall; Leonard Kritharides Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Rami Doukky; Nathan Frogge; Yohannes A Bayissa; Gautam Balakrishnan; Jacob M Skelton; Kara Confer; Kalindi Parikh; Russell F Kelly Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Sams Jaker; Amjad Burgan; Vineet Prakash; Alexander Birkinshaw; Kishan Moosai; Adam Jacques; David Fluck; Mark MacGregor; Otar Lazariashvili; Pankaj Sharma; Christopher H Fry; Thang S Han Journal: JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2020-03-24