Literature DB >> 22564784

Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): 'in vogue' but in which position?

Priyadarshi Kumar1, Christian Bach, Stephanos Kachrilas, Athanasios G Papatsoris, Noor Buchholz, Junaid Masood.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been described for over a decade and has equivalent success rates when compared with the more widely used prone position. The supine position offers a shorter operative duration with better access to the airway for the anaesthetist and also allows for simultaneous retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). Various supine positions have been described but there is little data regarding their differing benefits and disadvantages. The present study looks at the different supine PCNL positions and compares the strengths and weaknesses of each. Each of the previously described supine PCNL positions have some limitations, e.g. ease of puncture under image guidance, the ability and ease of making and dilating multiple tracts, and allowing simultaneous RIRS. The new 'Barts flank-free modified supine position' is described, which seems to offer a good compromise and addresses some of these issues. It is important to highlight that one supine position does not fit all and the endourologist should familiarise themselves with these positions so the appropriate position can be used for the right patient and stone burden.
OBJECTIVE: • To discuss the relative merits of the different described supine positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and highlight the new 'Barts flank-free modified supine position', as the last decade has seen the emergence of various supine positions for PCNL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • We reviewed English publications on supine PCNL to look at the different positions being used to carry out PCNL and their relative merits. • We describe the new 'Barts flank-free modified supine position', which we think will add significantly to the armamentarium of the endourologist.
RESULTS: • Five different supine positions are discussed. • These include the complete supine, the Valdivia, the Galdakao modified Valdivia, the Barts modified Valdivia and the herein described Barts flank-free modified supine position • These positions all differ in regard to ease of puncture under image guidance, operative field availability, ability to make multiple tracts and the ease of combining retrograde intra-renal surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: • All of the supine positions decrease operative duration, as there is no need for repositioning and allow quick access to the airway for the anaesthetist. • However, one supine position does not fit all and the right one must be chosen for the right patient with the right stone burden. It is important for endourologists of today to familiarise themselves with these positions to be able to make these judgements.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564784     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11188.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position!

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Junhong Fan; Yang Liu; Jean de la Rosette; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Evaluation of the effect of Bernoulli maneuver on operative time during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Brovkin Sergei; Vladislav Grigoryev; Zhamshid Okhunov; Arvind Ganpule; Aleksei Pisarev; Yerbol Iskakov; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-03

3.  Implementation of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a novel position for an old operation.

Authors:  Mario Sofer; Eli Tavdi; Oleg Levi; Ishay Mintz; Yuval Bar-Yosef; Ami Sidi; Haim Matzkin; Alexander Tsivian
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Nadeem Sohail; Amjad Albodour; Khalid Mohammed Abdelrahman
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-10-31

5.  Prone versus modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Yanbo Wang; Yan Wang; Yunming Yao; Ning Xu; Haifeng Zhang; Qihui Chen; Zhihua Lu; Jinghai Hu; Xiaoqing Wang; Ji Lu; Yuanyuan Hao; Fengming Jiang; Yuchuan Hou; Chunxi Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution.

Authors:  Theocharis Karaolides; Konstantinos Moraitis; Christian Bach; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-08-11

Review 7.  What's new in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-08-14

8.  Free-flank modified supine vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Essam Abdel-Mohsen; Mostafa Kamel; Abdel-Latif Zayed; Emad A Salem; Ehab Ebrahim; Khalid Abdel Wahab; Ahmed Elaymen; Ashraf Shaheen; Hussien M Kamel
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-12-08

9.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: Safety and outcomes in a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Hani H Nour; Ahmed M Kamal; Samir E Ghobashi; Ahmed S Zayed; Mamdouh M Rushdy; Ahmed G El-Baz; Ahmed I Kamel; Tarek El-Leithy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-02-04

10.  Combined endoscopic surgery in the prone-split leg position for successful single-session removal of an encrusted ureteral stent: a case report.

Authors:  Tetsuya Isero; Shuzo Hamamoto; Satoshi Koiwa; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Yoshihiro Hashimoto; Takahiro Yasui; Yutaka Iwase; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.